Includes global state.vscdb, per-repo transcripts, workspace storage, composer exports, and restore scripts for a new machine. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
29 lines
82 KiB
JSON
29 lines
82 KiB
JSON
{"role":"user","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"<user_query>\n\t\nРуслан Исанбаев\n3 часа назад\n@lmru-devops-bot Коллеги, привет. Можете помочь понять почему не собирается релиз? https://jenkins.lmru.tech/job/aao/job/lmru-solution/job/lmru--detailed-solution/job/lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator/job/develop/\n\n4 ответа\nНовые сообщения\n\nlmru-devops-bot\nБОТ\n3 часа назад\nYour request has been registered: DOA-5556\n\n\t\nlmru-devops-bot\nБОТ\n-3 ч\n@Руслан Петрович\nПРАВИЛА ОБРАЩЕНИЯ:\n\n⏳ Дежурный ответит на обращение в течении рабочих часов (c 10 до 19 МСК)\n:kubernetes: По вопросам Kubernetes кластеров обращайтесь в канал ~lmru-k8s-platform-support (бот lmru-k8s-platform-bot)\n:warning: При критичном инциденте на проде можете эскалировать обращение по инструкции\n\nРуслан Исанбаев\n3 часа назад\nПри сборке релиза в препрод, есть шаг сдеелать деплой в perf среду, на этом этапе в кубе под уходит рестарт так как не видит секреты в волте, к самому волту подключается при этом. Если запустить сборку не релизную, а чисто на perf или другие среды, проблем нет и всё собирается.\n</user_query>"}]}}
|
||
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Разбираемся: при релизной сборке деплой в perf падает из‑за секретов в Vault, при обычной сборке на perf — нет. Ищем в репозитории различия между релизным и нерелизным пайплайном и настройками Vault.\n\n[REDACTED]"},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Glob","input":{"target_directory":"/home/ruslanpi/Documents/repos/lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator","glob_pattern":"**/*Jenkins*"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Glob","input":{"target_directory":"/home/ruslanpi/Documents/repos/lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator","glob_pattern":"**/*.jenkins*"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Grep","input":{"path":"/home/ruslanpi/Documents/repos/lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator","pattern":"vault|Vault|secret","glob":"*.{yml,yaml,groovy,jenkinsfile,Jenkinsfile}","-i":true}}]}}
|
||
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"[REDACTED]"},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Read","input":{"path":"/home/ruslanpi/Documents/repos/lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator/Jenkinsfile"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Read","input":{"path":"/home/ruslanpi/Documents/repos/lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator/values.yml"}}]}}
|
||
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"[REDACTED]"},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Read","input":{"path":"/home/ruslanpi/Documents/repos/lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator/src/main/resources/application.yml"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Read","input":{"path":"/home/ruslanpi/Documents/repos/lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator/src/main/resources/application-perf.yml"}}]}}
|
||
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"[REDACTED]"},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Grep","input":{"path":"/home/ruslanpi/Documents/repos/lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator","pattern":"release|perf|preprod|SPRING_","glob":"*.{md,yml,yaml}"}}]}}
|
||
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"В репозитории видно только обёртку пайплайна и конфиг приложения; сам сценарий «релиз → препрод → perf» живёт в **общих библиотеках** `solution-utils` / `common-utils` (см. `Jenkinsfile`), поэтому точную причину по коду этого репо не доказать — зато можно сузить круг проверок и объяснить типичные расхождения «релиз vs обычная сборка на perf».\n\n## Что важно в этом сервисе\n\nПри профиле **perf** Vault настроен так:\n\n```20:26:src/main/resources/application-perf.yml\nspring:\n cloud:\n vault:\n kv:\n backend: perf\n config:\n import: \"vault://perf/detailed-solution/aggregator\"\n```\n\nАутентификация — **AppRole** через переменные окружения:\n\n```21:29:src/main/resources/application.yml\n vault:\n ...\n authentication: approle\n namespace: aao\n app-role:\n role-id: ${SPRING_ROLE_ID}\n secret-id: ${SPRING_SECRET_ID}\n```\n\nТо есть для успешного старта нужны одновременно: **корректный Spring-профиль (`perf`)**, **доступ AppRole к KV `perf/.../detailed-solution/aggregator`**, и **реально выданные в под `SPRING_ROLE_ID` / `SPRING_SECRET_ID`** (в Helm они завязаны на `${SPRING_ROLE_ID}` / `${SPRING_SECRET_ID}` в `values.yml`).\n\nФраза «к Vault подключается, а секретов не видит» обычно означает не сетевой обрыв, а одно из: **успешный логин, но 403/404 на чтение KV**, **пустой/не тот путь**, **не тот профиль → другой `config.import`**, или **секрет в Kubernetes ещё не подставил значения в env**.\n\n## Почему так бывает именно на релизе, а не на «чистом» perf\n\n1. **Другие параметры шага деплоя** \n Релизный job часто передаёт другие `helm`-параметры: тег образа, `SPRING_PROFILES_ACTIVE`, имя/namespace секрета, override кластера. Любая ошибка вроде `preprod` вместо `perf` приведёт к попытке читать `vault://preprod/...` при деплое в perf (или наоборот) — симптомы похожи на «Vault есть, данных нет».\n\n2. **Другие Jenkins credentials** \n На шаге «деплой в perf» в релизной ветке может подставляться **другой** credential id для `SPRING_SECRET_ID` / роли, чем в job «собрать только perf». Тогда AppRole реально логинится, но **политика не даёт читать `perf/detailed-solution/aggregator`**.\n\n3. **Порядок и гонки** \n В цепочке «сначала препрод, потом perf» возможны сценарии, когда perf поднимается **до** готовности K8s-секрета/ExternalSecret или до обновления значений после предыдущего шага — на отдельном perf-job такого шага нет.\n\n4. **Масштаб и наблюдаемость** \n В `values.yml` для **perf** задано **4 реплики** и включён autoscaling — при проблеме со стартом рестартов «видно» больше, чем на среде с 1–2 репликами.\n\n## Что проверить по фактам (для DevOps / в тикете DOA-5556)\n\n- Логи приложения при падении: строки Spring Vault / `SecretNotFound` / `403` / `Permission denied` и **какой именно путь** запрашивается. \n- В шаге деплоя релиза на perf: **`SPRING_PROFILES_ACTIVE` содержит `perf`**, нет ли лишнего `preprod`. \n- Сравнить **rendered Helm values** или манифест пода между успешным perf-job и неуспешным релизом: **одинаковые ли env** для `SPRING_ROLE_ID`, `SPRING_SECRET_ID`, профиля. \n- В Vault: для **того же AppRole**, что использует релизный деплой, есть ли **read** на `perf/detailed-solution/aggregator` (и нужный KV engine/backend `perf`).\n\nИтого: в коде сервиса путь к секретам для perf зафиксирован и согласован; расхождение почти наверняка в **пайплайне/секретах Jenkins/Helm для релизного шага**, а не в самом `application-perf.yml`. Точный ответ даст сравнение логов и параметров двух job’ов плюс политики Vault для релизного AppRole — это как раз зона ответа дежурного DevOps по DOA-5556.\n\n[REDACTED]"}]}}
|
||
{"role":"user","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"<user_query>\n07:44:36 Extracting: BOOT-INF/lib/spring-security-core-5.7.11.jar -> /data/jenkins-root/workspace/d-solution--aggregator_develop_2/target/application/BOOT-INF/lib/spring-security-core-5.7.11.jar\n07:44:36 Extracting: BOOT-INF/lib/spring-security-crypto-5.7.11.jar -> /data/jenkins-root/workspace/d-solution--aggregator_develop_2/target/application/BOOT-INF/lib/spring-security-crypto-5.7.11.jar\n07:44:36 Extracting: BOOT-INF/lib/spring-boot-jarmode-layertools-2.7.18.jar -> /data/jenkins-root/workspace/d-solution--aggregator_develop_2/target/application/BOOT-INF/lib/spring-boot-jarmode-layertools-2.7.18.jar\n07:44:36 Extracting: BOOT-INF/classpath.idx -> /data/jenkins-root/workspace/d-solution--aggregator_develop_2/target/application/BOOT-INF/classpath.idx\n07:44:36 Extracting: BOOT-INF/layers.idx -> /data/jenkins-root/workspace/d-solution--aggregator_develop_2/target/application/BOOT-INF/layers.idx\n07:44:36 Extracted: 418 files\n07:44:36 [Pipeline] sh\n07:44:36 + test -f target/application/org/springframework/boot/loader/launch/JarLauncher.class\n07:44:36 [Pipeline] sh\n07:44:36 + echo FROM docker.art.lmru.tech/devops/base-image/java:liberica-17jdk\n07:44:36 [Pipeline] sh\n07:44:37 + echo ENV MAIN_CLASS=org.springframework.boot.loader.JarLauncher\n07:44:37 [Pipeline] newArtifactoryServer\n07:44:37 [Pipeline] isUnix\n07:44:37 [Pipeline] withEnv\n07:44:37 [Pipeline] {\n07:44:37 [Pipeline] sh\n07:44:37 + docker build -t docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:0.0.62 -t docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:0.0.62-SNAPSHOT -f Dockerfile target/application --pull\n07:44:38 #0 building with \"default\" instance using docker driver\n07:44:38 \n07:44:38 #1 [internal] load build definition from Dockerfile\n07:44:38 #1 transferring dockerfile: 160B done\n07:44:38 #1 DONE 0.0s\n07:44:38 \n07:44:38 #2 [internal] load metadata for docker.art.lmru.tech/devops/base-image/java:liberica-17jdk\n07:44:38 #2 DONE 0.4s\n07:44:38 \n07:44:38 #3 [internal] load .dockerignore\n07:44:38 #3 transferring context: 2B done\n07:44:38 #3 DONE 0.0s\n07:44:38 \n07:44:38 #4 [1/1] FROM docker.art.lmru.tech/devops/base-image/java:liberica-17jdk@sha256:212df2894e2ebced42ca3219df4c68c9ddec8326dae1d24ff65125b55ad42448\n07:44:38 #4 resolve docker.art.lmru.tech/devops/base-image/java:liberica-17jdk@sha256:212df2894e2ebced42ca3219df4c68c9ddec8326dae1d24ff65125b55ad42448 0.0s done\n07:44:38 #4 sha256:212df2894e2ebced42ca3219df4c68c9ddec8326dae1d24ff65125b55ad42448 1.58kB / 1.58kB done\n07:44:38 #4 sha256:6361e9ad633b2b602831cad9a0565f4f71b96bcd72e77504dba7c01fb5218166 19.57kB / 19.57kB done\n07:44:38 #4 sha256:3e2c9e5d2469bbd5bc12826de59dab4023c98b13b6ddc846440d3e4b68603a56 3.93MB / 3.93MB 0.1s done\n07:44:38 #4 sha256:9d4743213fb760567c24f247ad2f144887554fcfa4a091efc23cc8def8c4529a 10.53MB / 76.81MB 0.2s\n07:44:38 #4 sha256:9183d98ec0d901793fbfc3317e6054c7ee8e7ec85f1b1caa12233f311d088a9f 24.44kB / 24.44kB 0.1s done\n07:44:38 #4 sha256:ef51ceeeea20e20f34053ef4a94cfcaa8387318a6f73294bfbbcbccd4e62efcc 296B / 296B 0.0s done\n07:44:38 #4 sha256:8accd28a1fcd7f337fc02ecff5fa9e08d837bda544322bdebc0b411b1d40e4ee 7.34MB / 12.52MB 0.2s\n07:44:38 #4 extracting sha256:3e2c9e5d2469bbd5bc12826de59dab4023c98b13b6ddc846440d3e4b68603a56\n07:44:38 #4 sha256:9d4743213fb760567c24f247ad2f144887554fcfa4a091efc23cc8def8c4529a 17.83MB / 76.81MB 0.3s\n07:44:38 #4 sha256:8accd28a1fcd7f337fc02ecff5fa9e08d837bda544322bdebc0b411b1d40e4ee 12.52MB / 12.52MB 0.3s\n07:44:38 #4 sha256:9d4743213fb760567c24f247ad2f144887554fcfa4a091efc23cc8def8c4529a 27.26MB / 76.81MB 0.4s\n07:44:38 #4 sha256:8accd28a1fcd7f337fc02ecff5fa9e08d837bda544322bdebc0b411b1d40e4ee 12.52MB / 12.52MB 0.3s done\n07:44:38 #4 extracting sha256:3e2c9e5d2469bbd5bc12826de59dab4023c98b13b6ddc846440d3e4b68603a56 0.2s done\n07:44:38 #4 sha256:9d4743213fb760567c24f247ad2f144887554fcfa4a091efc23cc8def8c4529a 42.99MB / 76.81MB 0.5s\n07:44:38 #4 sha256:9d4743213fb760567c24f247ad2f144887554fcfa4a091efc23cc8def8c4529a 68.19MB / 76.81MB 0.7s\n07:44:39 #4 sha256:9d4743213fb760567c24f247ad2f144887554fcfa4a091efc23cc8def8c4529a 76.81MB / 76.81MB 0.8s\n07:44:39 #4 sha256:9d4743213fb760567c24f247ad2f144887554fcfa4a091efc23cc8def8c4529a 76.81MB / 76.81MB 0.8s done\n07:44:39 #4 extracting sha256:9d4743213fb760567c24f247ad2f144887554fcfa4a091efc23cc8def8c4529a\n07:44:40 #4 ...\n07:44:40 \n07:44:40 #5 [internal] load build context\n07:44:40 #5 transferring context: 118.95MB 1.8s done\n07:44:40 #5 DONE 1.8s\n07:44:40 \n07:44:40 #4 [1/1] FROM docker.art.lmru.tech/devops/base-image/java:liberica-17jdk@sha256:212df2894e2ebced42ca3219df4c68c9ddec8326dae1d24ff65125b55ad42448\n07:44:40 #4 extracting sha256:9d4743213fb760567c24f247ad2f144887554fcfa4a091efc23cc8def8c4529a 1.4s done\n07:44:40 #4 extracting sha256:9183d98ec0d901793fbfc3317e6054c7ee8e7ec85f1b1caa12233f311d088a9f done\n07:44:40 #4 extracting sha256:ef51ceeeea20e20f34053ef4a94cfcaa8387318a6f73294bfbbcbccd4e62efcc done\n07:44:40 #4 extracting sha256:8accd28a1fcd7f337fc02ecff5fa9e08d837bda544322bdebc0b411b1d40e4ee\n07:44:41 #4 extracting sha256:8accd28a1fcd7f337fc02ecff5fa9e08d837bda544322bdebc0b411b1d40e4ee 0.4s done\n07:44:41 #4 DONE 3.1s\n07:44:41 \n07:44:41 #6 [2/5] ONBUILD ADD ./org /application/org\n07:44:41 #6 DONE 0.3s\n07:44:41 \n07:44:41 #7 [3/5] ONBUILD ADD ./BOOT-INF/lib /application/BOOT-INF/lib\n07:44:41 #7 DONE 0.4s\n07:44:42 \n07:44:42 #8 [4/5] ONBUILD ADD ./BOOT-INF/classes /application/BOOT-INF/classes\n07:44:42 #8 DONE 0.1s\n07:44:42 \n07:44:42 #9 [5/5] ONBUILD ADD ./META-INF /application/META-INF\n07:44:42 #9 DONE 0.0s\n07:44:42 \n07:44:42 #10 exporting to image\n07:44:42 #10 exporting layers\n07:44:42 #10 exporting layers 0.7s done\n07:44:42 #10 writing image sha256:8348246b19b9628c69945e2e9f1f2345948d3c439d292079127a0ff40a025f42 done\n07:44:42 #10 naming to docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:0.0.62 done\n07:44:42 #10 naming to docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:0.0.62-SNAPSHOT done\n07:44:42 #10 DONE 0.7s\n07:44:42 [Pipeline] }\n07:44:42 [Pipeline] // withEnv\n07:44:42 [Pipeline] newBuildInfo\n07:44:42 [Pipeline] echo\n07:44:42 Building docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:0.0.62 image\n07:44:43 [Pipeline] newBuildInfo\n07:44:43 [Pipeline] dockerPushStep\n07:44:43 Executing command: /bin/sh -c git log --pretty=format:%s -1\n07:44:44 [d-solution--aggregator_develop_2] $ java -Djava.io.tmpdir=/data/jenkins-root/workspace/d-solution--aggregator_develop_2@tmp/artifactory/javatmpdir -cp /data/jenkins-root/workspace/d-solution--aggregator_develop_2@tmp/artifactory/cache/artifactory-plugin/4.0.8/* org.jfrog.build.extractor.docker.extractor.DockerPush\n07:44:45 Apr 08, 2026 4:44:45 AM org.jfrog.build.extractor.packageManager.PackageManagerLogger info\n07:44:45 INFO: Pushing image: docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:0.0.62\n07:44:58 Apr 08, 2026 4:44:58 AM org.jfrog.build.extractor.packageManager.PackageManagerLogger info\n07:44:58 INFO: Searching manifest for image \"docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:0.0.62\" in \"https://art.lmru.tech/artifactory\" under \"docker-local-aao\" repository\n07:44:58 Apr 08, 2026 4:44:58 AM org.jfrog.build.extractor.packageManager.PackageManagerLogger info\n07:44:58 INFO: Searching manifest in path: docker-local-aao/aggregator/0.0.62\n07:44:58 Apr 08, 2026 4:44:58 AM org.jfrog.build.extractor.packageManager.PackageManagerLogger info\n07:44:58 INFO: Trying to download manifest from docker-local-aao/aggregator/0.0.62/manifest.json\n07:44:59 Apr 08, 2026 4:44:59 AM org.jfrog.build.extractor.packageManager.PackageManagerLogger info\n07:44:59 INFO: Fetching details of published docker layers from Artifactory...\n07:45:01 Apr 08, 2026 4:45:01 AM org.jfrog.build.extractor.packageManager.PackageManagerLogger info\n07:45:01 INFO: Successfully pushed docker image: docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:0.0.62\n07:45:02 [Pipeline] sh\n07:45:02 + docker rmi docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:0.0.62\n07:45:02 Untagged: docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:0.0.62\n07:45:02 [Pipeline] echo\n07:45:02 Building docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:0.0.62-SNAPSHOT image\n07:45:02 [Pipeline] newBuildInfo\n07:45:02 [Pipeline] dockerPushStep\n07:45:02 [d-solution--aggregator_develop_2] $ java -Djava.io.tmpdir=/data/jenkins-root/workspace/d-solution--aggregator_develop_2@tmp/artifactory/javatmpdir -cp /data/jenkins-root/workspace/d-solution--aggregator_develop_2@tmp/artifactory/cache/artifactory-plugin/4.0.8/* org.jfrog.build.extractor.docker.extractor.DockerPush\n07:45:02 Executing command: /bin/sh -c git log --pretty=format:%s -1\n07:45:02 Apr 08, 2026 4:45:02 AM org.jfrog.build.extractor.packageManager.PackageManagerLogger info\n07:45:02 INFO: Pushing image: docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:0.0.62-SNAPSHOT\n07:45:03 Apr 08, 2026 4:45:03 AM org.jfrog.build.extractor.packageManager.PackageManagerLogger info\n07:45:03 INFO: Searching manifest for image \"docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:0.0.62-SNAPSHOT\" in \"https://art.lmru.tech/artifactory\" under \"docker-local-aao\" repository\n07:45:03 Apr 08, 2026 4:45:03 AM org.jfrog.build.extractor.packageManager.PackageManagerLogger info\n07:45:03 INFO: Searching manifest in path: docker-local-aao/aggregator/0.0.62-SNAPSHOT\n07:45:03 Apr 08, 2026 4:45:03 AM org.jfrog.build.extractor.packageManager.PackageManagerLogger info\n07:45:03 INFO: Trying to download manifest from docker-local-aao/aggregator/0.0.62-SNAPSHOT/manifest.json\n07:45:04 Apr 08, 2026 4:45:04 AM org.jfrog.build.extractor.packageManager.PackageManagerLogger info\n07:45:04 INFO: Fetching details of published docker layers from Artifactory...\n07:45:07 Apr 08, 2026 4:45:07 AM org.jfrog.build.extractor.packageManager.PackageManagerLogger info\n07:45:07 INFO: Successfully pushed docker image: docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:0.0.62-SNAPSHOT\n07:45:07 [Pipeline] sh\n07:45:07 + docker rmi docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:0.0.62-SNAPSHOT\n07:45:07 Untagged: docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:0.0.62-SNAPSHOT\n07:45:07 Untagged: docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator@sha256:4b58fd1c3702113066dbb6de157382e5a8e2f63024f3ee344aa17295a81497f3\n07:45:07 Deleted: sha256:8348246b19b9628c69945e2e9f1f2345948d3c439d292079127a0ff40a025f42\n07:45:07 [Pipeline] publishBuildInfo\n07:45:07 Deploying build info...\n07:45:08 Build-info successfully deployed. Browse it in Artifactory under https://art.lmru.tech/artifactory/webapp/builds/aao%20%3A%3A%20lmru-solution%20%3A%3A%20lmru--detailed-solution%20%3A%3A%20lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator%20%3A%3A%20develop/4\n07:45:08 Sending async request for build retention, deleting build artifacts, min build date: Wed Apr 01 07:45:07 MSK 2026.\n07:45:08 [Pipeline] artifactoryPromoteBuild\n07:45:08 Promoting 'aao :: lmru-solution :: lmru--detailed-solution :: lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator :: develop' #4 to 'docker-release-aao' from 'docker-local-aao', with status: 'Released', with comment: 'Promoted with Jenkins', failing on first error.\n07:45:08 Performing dry run promotion (no changes are made during dry run) ...\n07:45:08 Dry run finished successfully.\n07:45:08 Performing promotion ...\n07:45:07 Executing command: /bin/sh -c git log --pretty=format:%s -1\n07:45:11 Promotion completed successfully!\n07:45:11 [Pipeline] echo\n07:45:11 ================ END BUILD IMAGE ================\n07:45:11 [Pipeline] stage\n07:45:11 [Pipeline] { (Start deploy on perf)\n07:45:11 [Pipeline] echo\n07:45:11 ================ DEPLOY PARAMETERS ================\n07:45:11 [Pipeline] echo\n07:45:11 kuberentesNamespace = detailed-solution-perf\n07:45:11 [Pipeline] echo\n07:45:11 helmReleaseName = detailed-solution-perf-aggregator\n07:45:11 [Pipeline] echo\n07:45:11 env = perf\n07:45:11 [Pipeline] echo\n07:45:11 imageTag = 0.0.62\n07:45:11 [Pipeline] sh\n07:45:11 + git log -n 1 --pretty=format:%H\n07:45:11 [Pipeline] echo\n07:45:11 commitSha = 80ba9d66ebd498dde85711b150a4a93b9dd36dd6\n07:45:11 [Pipeline] echo\n07:45:11 ============== END DEPLOY PARAMETERS ==============\n07:45:11 [Pipeline] withCredentials\n07:45:11 Masking supported pattern matches of $SPRING_ROLE_ID or $SPRING_SECRET_ID\n07:45:11 [Pipeline] {\n07:45:11 [Pipeline] readFile\n07:45:11 [Pipeline] sh\n07:45:11 + envsubst\n07:45:11 [Pipeline] sh\n07:45:12 + mv -f values_full.yml values.yml\n07:45:12 [Pipeline] }\n07:45:12 [Pipeline] // withCredentials\n07:45:12 [Pipeline] echo\n07:45:12 ================ START DEPLOY ================\n07:45:12 [Pipeline] readYaml\n07:45:12 [Pipeline] sh\n07:45:12 + git log -n 1 --pretty=format:%H\n07:45:12 [Pipeline] stage\n07:45:12 [Pipeline] { (Deploy to lepus-a-stage)\n07:45:12 [Pipeline] withCredentials\n07:45:12 Masking supported pattern matches of $USERNAME or $PASSWORD\n07:45:12 [Pipeline] {\n07:45:12 [Pipeline] withEnv\n07:45:12 [Pipeline] {\n07:45:12 [Pipeline] isUnix\n07:45:12 [Pipeline] withEnv\n07:45:12 [Pipeline] {\n07:45:12 [Pipeline] sh\n07:45:13 + docker pull docker.art.lmru.tech/img-k8s-deployer:latest\n07:45:13 latest: Pulling from img-k8s-deployer\n07:45:13 Digest: sha256:3528ee39a8506c5b88c6a34d70b3bc9edd8fbd1360bfa88364a1a5bb340a5912\n07:45:13 Status: Image is up to date for docker.art.lmru.tech/img-k8s-deployer:latest\n07:45:13 docker.art.lmru.tech/img-k8s-deployer:latest\n07:45:13 [Pipeline] }\n07:45:13 [Pipeline] // withEnv\n07:45:13 [Pipeline] pwd\n07:45:13 [Pipeline] isUnix\n07:45:13 [Pipeline] withEnv\n07:45:13 [Pipeline] {\n07:45:13 [Pipeline] sh\n07:45:13 + docker inspect -f . docker.art.lmru.tech/img-k8s-deployer:latest\n07:45:13 .\n07:45:13 [Pipeline] }\n07:45:13 [Pipeline] // withEnv\n07:45:13 [Pipeline] withDockerContainer\n07:45:13 p-jenkins-node-m-11 does not seem to be running inside a container\n07:45:13 $ docker run -t -d -u 0:0 -u root -v /data/jenkins-root/workspace/d-solution--aggregator_develop_2:/pwd -w /data/jenkins-root/workspace/d-solution--aggregator_develop_2 -v /data/jenkins-root/workspace/d-solution--aggregator_develop_2:/data/jenkins-root/workspace/d-solution--aggregator_develop_2:rw,z -v /data/jenkins-root/workspace/d-solution--aggregator_develop_2@tmp:/data/jenkins-root/workspace/d-solution--aggregator_develop_2@tmp:rw,z -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** docker.art.lmru.tech/img-k8s-deployer:latest cat\n07:45:13 $ docker top c9948edabe8f8b4e56395b3256acaee2d87e8176650a80c09f8372cbef46ca53 -eo pid,comm\n07:45:13 [Pipeline] {\n07:45:13 [Pipeline] sh\n07:45:14 + get-kubeconfig-basic\n07:45:14 Using default value for CLUSTER_API_PREFIX = api-\n07:45:14 Using default value for CLUSTER_DOMAIN = apps.lmru.tech\n07:45:14 Kubeconfig file was created.\n07:45:14 [Pipeline] sh\n07:45:14 + helm3 repo update\n07:45:14 CLUSTER: lepus-a-stage\n07:45:17 Hang tight while we grab the latest from your chart repositories...\n07:45:17 ...Successfully got an update from the \"default\" chart repository\n07:45:17 ...Successfully got an update from the \"stable\" chart repository\n07:45:17 Update Complete. ⎈Happy Helming!⎈\n07:45:17 WARNING: Kubernetes configuration file is group-readable. This is insecure. Location: /root/.kube/config\n07:45:17 WARNING: Kubernetes configuration file is world-readable. This is insecure. Location: /root/.kube/config\n07:45:17 [Pipeline] sh\n07:45:17 + test -d solution\n07:45:18 [Pipeline] sh\n07:45:18 + helm3 fetch '--untar=true' --version 2.7.0 default/solution\n07:45:18 CLUSTER: lepus-a-stage\n07:45:18 WARNING: Kubernetes configuration file is group-readable. This is insecure. Location: /root/.kube/config\n07:45:18 WARNING: Kubernetes configuration file is world-readable. This is insecure. Location: /root/.kube/config\n07:45:18 [Pipeline] sh\n07:45:19 + helm3 dep up solution\n07:45:19 CLUSTER: lepus-a-stage\n07:45:19 WARNING: Kubernetes configuration file is group-readable. This is insecure. Location: /root/.kube/config\n07:45:19 WARNING: Kubernetes configuration file is world-readable. This is insecure. Location: /root/.kube/config\n07:45:19 [Pipeline] sh\n07:45:19 + helm3 upgrade --install --atomic --wait --create-namespace -f /pwd/values.yml --set 'tag=perf' --set 'sha=80ba9d66ebd498dde85711b150a4a93b9dd36dd6' --set 'deployOnProd=false' --set 'clusterName=lepus-a-stage' --timeout 3000s --set 'imageVersion=0.0.62' --set 'environment.springProfilesActive.default=perf' --namespace detailed-solution-perf detailed-solution-perf-aggregator solution\n07:45:19 CLUSTER: lepus-a-stage\n08:35:30 WARNING: Kubernetes configuration file is group-readable. This is insecure. Location: /root/.kube/config\n08:35:30 WARNING: Kubernetes configuration file is world-readable. This is insecure. Location: /root/.kube/config\n08:35:30 Error: UPGRADE FAILED: release detailed-solution-perf-aggregator failed, and has been rolled back due to atomic being set: client rate limiter Wait returned an error: context deadline exceeded\n08:35:30 Result of the deployment is saved to CMDB.\n08:35:31 [Pipeline] }\n08:35:31 $ docker stop --time=1 c9948edabe8f8b4e56395b3256acaee2d87e8176650a80c09f8372cbef46ca53\n08:35:32 $ docker rm -f --volumes c9948edabe8f8b4e56395b3256acaee2d87e8176650a80c09f8372cbef46ca53\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] // withDockerContainer\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] }\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] // withEnv\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] }\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] // withCredentials\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] }\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] // stage\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] error\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] }\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] // stage\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] echo\n08:35:32 java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Could not instantiate {message=hudson.AbortException: script returned exit code 1} for org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.steps.ErrorStep: java.lang.ClassCastException: org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.steps.ErrorStep.message expects class java.lang.String but received class hudson.AbortException\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] withCredentials\n08:35:32 Masking supported pattern matches of $STAGE_CHAT_ID\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] {\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] withCredentials\n08:35:32 Masking supported pattern matches of $TOKEN\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] {\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] catchError\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] {\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] retry\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] {\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] httpRequest\n08:35:32 Warning: A secret was passed to \"httpRequest\" using Groovy String interpolation, which is insecure.\n08:35:32 \t\t Affected argument(s) used the following variable(s): [TOKEN]\n08:35:32 \t\t See https://jenkins.io/redirect/groovy-string-interpolation for details.\n08:35:32 HttpMethod: POST\n08:35:32 URL: https://lemanapro.loop.ru/api/v4/posts\n08:35:32 Content-Type: application/json; charset=UTF-8\n08:35:32 Accept: application/json\n08:35:32 Authorization: *****\n08:35:32 Sending request to url: https://lemanapro.loop.ru/api/v4/posts\n08:35:32 Response Code: 201\n08:35:32 Success: Status code 201 is in the accepted range: 100:399\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] }\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] // retry\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] }\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] // catchError\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] }\n08:35:33 [Pipeline] // withCredentials\n08:35:33 [Pipeline] }\n08:35:33 [Pipeline] // withCredentials\n08:35:33 [Pipeline] }\n08:35:33 [Pipeline] // node\n08:35:33 [Pipeline] End of Pipeline\n08:35:33 java.lang.ClassCastException: org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.steps.ErrorStep.message expects class java.lang.String but received class hudson.AbortException\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for structs//org.jenkinsci.plugins.structs.describable.DescribableModel.coerce(DescribableModel.java:495)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for structs//org.jenkinsci.plugins.structs.describable.DescribableModel.buildArguments(DescribableModel.java:412)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for structs//org.jenkinsci.plugins.structs.describable.DescribableModel.instantiate(DescribableModel.java:328)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.DSL.invokeStep(DSL.java:312)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.DSL.invokeMethod(DSL.java:194)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsScript.invokeMethod(CpsScript.java:124)\n08:35:33 \tat java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(Unknown Source)\n08:35:33 \tat java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)\n08:35:33 \tat org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.CachedMethod.invoke(CachedMethod.java:98)\n08:35:33 \tat groovy.lang.MetaMethod.doMethodInvoke(MetaMethod.java:325)\n08:35:33 \tat groovy.lang.MetaClassImpl.invokeMethod(MetaClassImpl.java:1225)\n08:35:33 \tat groovy.lang.MetaClassImpl.invokeMethod(MetaClassImpl.java:1034)\n08:35:33 \tat org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.PogoMetaClassSite.call(PogoMetaClassSite.java:41)\n08:35:33 \tat org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.CallSiteArray.defaultCall(CallSiteArray.java:47)\n08:35:33 \tat org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.call(AbstractCallSite.java:116)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for script-security//org.kohsuke.groovy.sandbox.impl.Checker$1.call(Checker.java:180)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for script-security//org.kohsuke.groovy.sandbox.GroovyInterceptor.onMethodCall(GroovyInterceptor.java:23)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for script-security//org.jenkinsci.plugins.scriptsecurity.sandbox.groovy.SandboxInterceptor.onMethodCall(SandboxInterceptor.java:163)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for script-security//org.kohsuke.groovy.sandbox.impl.Checker$1.call(Checker.java:178)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for script-security//org.kohsuke.groovy.sandbox.impl.Checker.checkedCall(Checker.java:182)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for script-security//org.kohsuke.groovy.sandbox.impl.Checker.checkedCall(Checker.java:152)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.sandbox.SandboxInvoker.methodCall(SandboxInvoker.java:17)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.LoggingInvoker.methodCall(LoggingInvoker.java:120)\n08:35:33 Also: org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.actions.ErrorAction$ErrorId: 380555b5-f235-461f-9fc6-1bfd2d81f56c\n08:35:33 Caused: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Could not instantiate {message=hudson.AbortException: script returned exit code 1} for org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.steps.ErrorStep\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for structs//org.jenkinsci.plugins.structs.describable.DescribableModel.instantiate(DescribableModel.java:338)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.DSL.invokeStep(DSL.java:312)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.DSL.invokeMethod(DSL.java:194)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsScript.invokeMethod(CpsScript.java:124)\n08:35:33 \tat java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(Unknown Source)\n08:35:33 \tat java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)\n08:35:33 \tat org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.CachedMethod.invoke(CachedMethod.java:98)\n08:35:33 \tat groovy.lang.MetaMethod.doMethodInvoke(MetaMethod.java:325)\n08:35:33 \tat groovy.lang.MetaClassImpl.invokeMethod(MetaClassImpl.java:1225)\n08:35:33 \tat groovy.lang.MetaClassImpl.invokeMethod(MetaClassImpl.java:1034)\n08:35:33 \tat org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.PogoMetaClassSite.call(PogoMetaClassSite.java:41)\n08:35:33 \tat org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.CallSiteArray.defaultCall(CallSiteArray.java:47)\n08:35:33 \tat org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.call(AbstractCallSite.java:116)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for script-security//org.kohsuke.groovy.sandbox.impl.Checker$1.call(Checker.java:180)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for script-security//org.kohsuke.groovy.sandbox.GroovyInterceptor.onMethodCall(GroovyInterceptor.java:23)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for script-security//org.jenkinsci.plugins.scriptsecurity.sandbox.groovy.SandboxInterceptor.onMethodCall(SandboxInterceptor.java:163)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for script-security//org.kohsuke.groovy.sandbox.impl.Checker$1.call(Checker.java:178)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for script-security//org.kohsuke.groovy.sandbox.impl.Checker.checkedCall(Checker.java:182)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for script-security//org.kohsuke.groovy.sandbox.impl.Checker.checkedCall(Checker.java:152)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.sandbox.SandboxInvoker.methodCall(SandboxInvoker.java:17)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.LoggingInvoker.methodCall(LoggingInvoker.java:120)\n08:35:33 \tat solutionPipeline.deploy(solutionPipeline.groovy:450)\n08:35:33 \tat com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.CpsDefaultGroovyMethods.each(CpsDefaultGroovyMethods:2125)\n08:35:33 \tat com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.CpsDefaultGroovyMethods.each(CpsDefaultGroovyMethods:2110)\n08:35:33 \tat com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.CpsDefaultGroovyMethods.each(CpsDefaultGroovyMethods:2151)\n08:35:33 \tat solutionPipeline.deploy(solutionPipeline.groovy:423)\n08:35:33 \tat solutionPipeline.call(solutionPipeline.groovy:37)\n08:35:33 \tat ___cps.transform___(Native Method)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.impl.ContinuationGroup.methodCall(ContinuationGroup.java:107)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.impl.FunctionCallBlock$ContinuationImpl.dispatchOrArg(FunctionCallBlock.java:118)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.impl.FunctionCallBlock$ContinuationImpl.fixArg(FunctionCallBlock.java:87)\n08:35:33 \tat java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(Unknown Source)\n08:35:33 \tat java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.impl.ContinuationPtr$ContinuationImpl.receive(ContinuationPtr.java:71)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.impl.LocalVariableBlock$LocalVariable.get(LocalVariableBlock.java:39)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.LValueBlock$GetAdapter.receive(LValueBlock.java:30)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.impl.LocalVariableBlock.evalLValue(LocalVariableBlock.java:28)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.LValueBlock$BlockImpl.eval(LValueBlock.java:54)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.LValueBlock.eval(LValueBlock.java:16)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.Next.step(Next.java:84)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.Continuable.run0(Continuable.java:142)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.SandboxContinuable.access$001(SandboxContinuable.java:17)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.SandboxContinuable.run0(SandboxContinuable.java:48)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsThread.runNextChunk(CpsThread.java:188)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsThreadGroup.run(CpsThreadGroup.java:464)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsThreadGroup$2.call(CpsThreadGroup.java:372)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsThreadGroup$2.call(CpsThreadGroup.java:302)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsVmExecutorService.lambda$wrap$4(CpsVmExecutorService.java:143)\n08:35:33 \tat java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(Unknown Source)\n08:35:33 \tat hudson.remoting.SingleLaneExecutorService$1.run(SingleLaneExecutorService.java:139)\n08:35:33 \tat jenkins.util.ContextResettingExecutorService$1.run(ContextResettingExecutorService.java:28)\n08:35:33 \tat jenkins.security.ImpersonatingExecutorService$1.run(ImpersonatingExecutorService.java:68)\n08:35:33 \tat jenkins.util.ErrorLoggingExecutorService.lambda$wrap$0(ErrorLoggingExecutorService.java:51)\n08:35:33 \tat java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Unknown Source)\n08:35:33 \tat java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(Unknown Source)\n08:35:33 \tat java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(Unknown Source)\n08:35:33 \tat java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown Source)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsVmExecutorService$1.call(CpsVmExecutorService.java:53)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsVmExecutorService$1.call(CpsVmExecutorService.java:50)\n08:35:33 \tat org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.GroovyCategorySupport$ThreadCategoryInfo.use(GroovyCategorySupport.java:136)\n08:35:33 \tat org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.GroovyCategorySupport.use(GroovyCategorySupport.java:275)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsVmExecutorService.lambda$categoryThreadFactory$0(CpsVmExecutorService.java:50)\n08:35:33 \tat java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)\n08:35:33 \n08:35:33 GitHub has been notified of this commit’s build result\n08:35:33 \n08:35:33 Finished: FAILURE\n</user_query>"}]}}
|
||
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"По этому логу картина **другая**, чем «просто нет секретов в Vault» — хотя крашлуп из‑за Vault по‑прежнему может быть **причиной**, почему деплой не дождался готовности.\n\n## Что реально упало\n\n1. **Helm завершился с таймаутом ожидания**, не с явной ошибкой Vault:\n\n```text\nError: UPGRADE FAILED: release detailed-solution-perf-aggregator failed, and has been rolled back due to atomic being set: client rate limiter Wait returned an error: context deadline exceeded\n```\n\n2. **Время**: деплой стартовал около `07:45:19`, ошибка — `08:35:30`, то есть прошло **порядка 50 минут**. В команде указано `--timeout 3000s` (3000 секунд ≈ **50 минут**). То есть Helm **всё это время** ждал, пока релиз станет успешным по правилам `--wait`, и **исчерпал лимит**.\n\n3. С флагами **`--atomic` + `--wait`** при неуспехе Helm **откатывает** релиз. Сообщение про **client rate limiter** часто всплывает, когда клиент долго опрашивает API и упирается в **deadline** ожидания (не обязательно отдельная «проблема с rate limit кластера»).\n\nИтого: **прямая причина в логе — таймаут ожидания готовности релиза**, а не строка про Vault. Почему релиз не стал ready за 50 минут — в этом фрагменте **не видно** (нужны события/логи подов в `detailed-solution-perf` за это окно).\n\n## Параметры деплоя выглядят логично\n\nВ логе явно:\n\n- `env = perf`, `imageTag = 0.0.62`\n- `--set 'environment.springProfilesActive.default=perf'`\n- namespace `detailed-solution-perf`\n\nТо есть **профиль perf в Helm задан**, это не похоже на случайную подстановку `preprod` вместо `perf` **на уровне этой команды**.\n\n## Вторичная ошибка Jenkins (шум для разбора)\n\nВ конце:\n\n```text\nClassCastException: ErrorStep.message expects class java.lang.String but received class hudson.AbortException\nat solutionPipeline.deploy(solutionPipeline.groovy:450)\n```\n\nЭто **баг в shared library** `solutionPipeline`: в шаг `error` передают не строку, а `AbortException`. Он **маскирует** нормальное сообщение об ошибке деплоя; чинить нужно в `solution-utils`, не в репозитории сервиса.\n\n## Что проверить дальше (по факту, не по гипотезе)\n\nЧтобы связать с Vault или нет, в момент следующего падения нужно смотреть **в кластере** (за те же ~50 минут):\n\n- `kubectl describe pod` / `kubectl get events -n detailed-solution-perf` — **Back-off**, **CrashLoopBackOff**, **Readiness probe failed**, OOM.\n- Логи контейнера — есть ли **Spring Vault** / `403` / `404` / `Secret not found` при старте.\n\nЕсли поды **долго в CrashLoop** из‑за конфигурации/Vault, Helm как раз будет ждать до таймаута — тогда ваша изначальная гипотеза про секреты **согласуется** с этим логом, но **доказательство** — только из Kubernetes, не из Jenkins.\n\n**Кратко:** лог говорит «**деплой не стал ready за 50 минут, Helm откатился**»; отдельно в пайплайне есть **баг обработки ошибки** (`ClassCastException`). Чтобы подтвердить Vault, нужны **events/logs подов**, не только вывод `helm upgrade`.\n\n[REDACTED]"}]}}
|
||
{"role":"user","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"<user_query>\nпереключился в нужный контекст кубцтл, проверяй\n</user_query>"}]}}
|
||
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Проверяю состояние namespace `detailed-solution-perf` и связанных ресурсов.\n\n[REDACTED]"},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"kubectl config current-context && kubectl get ns detailed-solution-perf 2>&1; kubectl get pods,deploy,sts -n detailed-solution-perf -o wide 2>&1","description":"Verify context and list workloads in perf namespace"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"kubectl get events -n detailed-solution-perf --sort-by='.lastTimestamp' 2>&1 | tail -40","description":"Recent events in detailed-solution-perf namespace"}}]}}
|
||
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"[REDACTED]"},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"helm list -n detailed-solution-perf 2>&1; kubectl get hpa -n detailed-solution-perf 2>&1; kubectl get deploy aggregator -n detailed-solution-perf -o jsonpath='{.spec.template.spec.containers[0].image}{\"\\n\"}{.spec.replicas}{\"\\n\"}' 2>&1","description":"Helm releases, HPA, deployment image and replicas"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"kubectl describe deploy aggregator -n detailed-solution-perf 2>&1 | head -80","description":"Deployment details and conditions"}}]}}
|
||
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Кратко по тому, что видно в **текущем** контексте `lepus-a-stage`:\n\n## Состояние сейчас — нормальное\n\n| Проверка | Результат |\n|----------|-----------|\n| **Namespace** | `detailed-solution-perf` существует |\n| **Helm** | `detailed-solution-perf-aggregator`, chart `solution-2.7.0`, revision **9**, статус **deployed** (обновление **2026-04-08 11:47** МСК) |\n| **Deployment `aggregator`** | **9/9** Ready, Available |\n| **Образ** | `docker-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:develop` (не `0.0.62` из упавшего job) |\n| **Профиль** | `SPRING_PROFILES_ACTIVE=perf` |\n| **Vault в поде** | `SPRING_ROLE_ID` и `SPRING_SECRET_ID` заданы в env (значения есть, дублировать их в чат не буду) |\n\n## HPA\n\n- `aggregator-hpa`: **9** реплик при max **10**, CPU по метрикам **высокий** (~119% к цели 80%) — нагрузка заметная, масштабирование в игре.\n\n## События\n\n- Недавний rolling update: новый ReplicaSet `aggregator-5df85ccc45`, старый `6b8c77d578` убран.\n- Короткие **Startup probe failed / connection refused** на старте — типично, пока JVM ещё не слушает порт; затем поды переходят в **Running 1/1**.\n\n## Связь с падением Jenkins\n\nВ логе падал деплой образа **`0.0.62`** с таймаутом Helm. Сейчас в кластере крутится **`develop`** — значит, после отката или отдельного деплоя среда пришла в рабочее состояние, но **релизный тег 0.0.62 здесь не зафиксирован**.\n\nЕсли нужно, могу отдельно подсказать команды для проверки истории ревизий Helm (`helm history`) или логов конкретного пода — напиши, что именно смотреть дальше.\n\n[REDACTED]"}]}}
|
||
{"role":"user","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"<user_query>\nзапутил билд 11:50:31 [Pipeline] echo\n11:50:31 Pipeline:\n11:50:31 {\n11:50:31 \"applicationConfig\": {\n11:50:31 \"functionalTests\": {\n11:50:31 \"branch\": \"master\",\n11:50:31 \"jobName\": \"aao/tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-functional-tests\"\n11:50:31 },\n11:50:31 \"vaultNamespace\": \"aao\",\n11:50:31 \"lmSaCredentialsId\": \"aao\",\n11:50:31 \"k8sNamespace\": \"detailed-solution\",\n11:50:31 \"loadTests\": {\n11:50:31 \"parameters\": {\n11:50:31 \"node\": \"lmru-dockerhost\",\n11:50:31 \"baseUrl\": \"https://detailed-solution-perf-lepus-a-stage.apps.lmru.tech/aggregator\",\n11:50:31 \"restRps\": \"400\",\n11:50:31 \"rabbitMps\": \"154\",\n11:50:31 \"rise\": \"5\",\n11:50:31 \"duration\": \"20\",\n11:50:31 \"class\": \"ru.leroymerlin.qa.test.CrawlerAndAggregatorSimulation\"\n11:50:31 },\n11:50:31 \"branch\": \"master\",\n11:50:31 \"jobName\": \"aao/tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-load-tests\"\n11:50:31 },\n11:50:31 \"javaVersion\": \"17\"\n11:50:31 },\n11:50:31 \"jobParams\": {\n11:50:31 \"runIacScan\": false,\n11:50:31 \"createSeparateEnvironment\": false,\n11:50:31 \"runScaScan\": false,\n11:50:31 \"deploy\": true,\n11:50:31 \"replicasCount\": \"\",\n11:50:31 \"profile\": \"preprod\",\n11:50:31 \"startHotfix\": false,\n11:50:31 \"build\": true,\n11:50:31 \"isDebug\": false,\n11:50:31 \"runCheckmarxScan\": false\n11:50:31 },\n11:50:31 \"buildInfo\": {\n11:50:31 \"microservice\": \"aggregator\",\n11:50:31 \"tasks\": [\n11:50:31 \n11:50:31 ],\n11:50:31 \"projectVersion\": \"0.0.63-SNAPSHOT\",\n11:50:31 \"imageTag\": \"0.0.63\",\n11:50:31 \"domainName\": \"aao\",\n11:50:31 \"targetVersion\": \"0.0.63\",\n11:50:31 \"brickName\": null\n11:50:31 },\n11:50:31 \"launchInfo\": {\n11:50:31 \"jobUrl\": \"https://jenkins.lmru.tech/job/aao/job/lmru-solution/job/lmru--detailed-solution/job/lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator/job/develop/7/\",\n11:50:31 \"branch\": \"develop\",\n11:50:31 \"tag\": null,\n11:50:31 \"changeId\": null,\n11:50:31 \"changeBranch\": null,\n11:50:31 \"author\": \"\\u0420\\u0443\\u0441\\u043b\\u0430\\u043d \\u041f\\u0435\\u0442\\u0440\\u043e\\u0432\\u0438\\u0447\"\n11:50:31 }\n</user_query>"}]}}
|
||
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Вот что видно из этого фрагмента пайплайна.\n\n## Главное: выбран профиль **preprod**\n\n```json\n\"profile\": \"preprod\"\n```\n\nПри `deploy: true` пайплайн будет ориентироваться на **preprod** (неймспейс/окружение из `solutionPipeline`, обычно что-то вроде `detailed-solution-preprod`, а не `detailed-solution-perf`).\n\nЭто **не** «чистый perf»-деплой. Perf в вашем сценарии часто идёт **отдельным шагом** (например, после релизной сборки образа) или другим параметром job — смотрите дальше по логу стадии **Deploy** / **DEPLOY PARAMETERS** (`env`, `helmReleaseName`, `kuberentesNamespace`).\n\n## Остальное по конфигу\n\n| Поле | Значение |\n|------|----------|\n| Ветка | `develop` |\n| Версия / тег образа | `0.0.63` (`0.0.63-SNAPSHOT` в Maven) |\n| Сборка и деплой | `build: true`, `deploy: true` |\n| Функциональные / нагрузочные тесты | в конфиге указаны job’ы и `baseUrl` для **perf** — это просто **настройки тестов** (куда бить нагрузкой), они **не** переключают профиль деплоя на perf |\n\n## Практический вывод\n\nЕсли цель была **обновить только perf**, а в параметрах job стоит **`profile: preprod`**, то сначала уедет **preprod**. Чтобы деплоить именно perf, в Jenkins нужно выставить профиль **`perf`** (или как у вас в UI называется этот параметр), если пайплайн это поддерживает одной сборкой.\n\nЕсли пришлёте следующий кусок лога — блок **`DEPLOY PARAMETERS`** и строку **`helm3 upgrade`** — можно точно сказать, в какой namespace и с каким `springProfilesActive` ушла эта сборка **#7**.\n\n[REDACTED]"}]}}
|
||
{"role":"user","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"<user_query>\n\t\nРуслан Исанбаев\n3 часа назад\nПри сборке релиза в препрод, есть шаг сдеелать деплой в perf среду, на этом этапе в кубе под уходит рестарт так как не видит секреты в волте, к самому волту подключается при этом. Если запустить сборку не релизную, а чисто на perf или другие среды, проблем нет и всё собирается.\nсейчас как раз завис деплой\n11:58:05 ================ END BUILD IMAGE ================\n11:58:05 [Pipeline] stage\n11:58:05 [Pipeline] { (Start deploy on perf)\n11:58:05 [Pipeline] echo\n11:58:05 ================ DEPLOY PARAMETERS ================\n11:58:05 [Pipeline] echo\n11:58:05 kuberentesNamespace = detailed-solution-perf\n11:58:05 [Pipeline] echo\n11:58:05 helmReleaseName = detailed-solution-perf-aggregator\n11:58:05 [Pipeline] echo\n11:58:05 env = perf\n11:58:05 [Pipeline] echo\n11:58:05 imageTag = 0.0.63\n11:58:05 [Pipeline] sh\n11:58:06 + git log -n 1 --pretty=format:%H\n11:58:06 [Pipeline] echo\n11:58:06 commitSha = 6e72af3aa837ba9d3a49bd9be9131da355dec3f5\n11:58:06 [Pipeline] echo\n11:58:06 ============== END DEPLOY PARAMETERS ==============\n11:58:06 [Pipeline] withCredentials\n11:58:06 Masking supported pattern matches of $SPRING_ROLE_ID or $SPRING_SECRET_ID\n11:58:06 [Pipeline] {\n11:58:06 [Pipeline] readFile\n11:58:06 [Pipeline] sh\n11:58:06 + envsubst\n11:58:06 [Pipeline] sh\n11:58:06 + mv -f values_full.yml values.yml\n11:58:06 [Pipeline] }\n11:58:06 [Pipeline] // withCredentials\n11:58:06 [Pipeline] echo\n11:58:06 ================ START DEPLOY ================\n11:58:06 [Pipeline] readYaml\n11:58:06 [Pipeline] sh\n11:58:07 + git log -n 1 --pretty=format:%H\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] stage\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] { (Deploy to lepus-a-stage)\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] withCredentials\n11:58:07 Masking supported pattern matches of $USERNAME or $PASSWORD\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] {\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] withEnv\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] {\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] isUnix\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] withEnv\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] {\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] sh\n11:58:07 + docker pull docker.art.lmru.tech/img-k8s-deployer:latest\n11:58:07 latest: Pulling from img-k8s-deployer\n11:58:07 Digest: sha256:3528ee39a8506c5b88c6a34d70b3bc9edd8fbd1360bfa88364a1a5bb340a5912\n11:58:07 Status: Image is up to date for docker.art.lmru.tech/img-k8s-deployer:latest\n11:58:07 docker.art.lmru.tech/img-k8s-deployer:latest\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] }\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] // withEnv\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] pwd\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] isUnix\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] withEnv\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] {\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] sh\n11:58:08 + docker inspect -f . docker.art.lmru.tech/img-k8s-deployer:latest\n11:58:08 .\n11:58:08 [Pipeline] }\n11:58:08 [Pipeline] // withEnv\n11:58:08 [Pipeline] withDockerContainer\n11:58:08 p-jenkins-node-m-17 does not seem to be running inside a container\n11:58:08 $ docker run -t -d -u 0:0 -u root -v /data/jenkins-root/workspace/led-solution--aggregator_develop:/pwd -w /data/jenkins-root/workspace/led-solution--aggregator_develop -v /data/jenkins-root/workspace/led-solution--aggregator_develop:/data/jenkins-root/workspace/led-solution--aggregator_develop:rw,z -v /data/jenkins-root/workspace/led-solution--aggregator_develop@tmp:/data/jenkins-root/workspace/led-solution--aggregator_develop@tmp:rw,z -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** docker.art.lmru.tech/img-k8s-deployer:latest cat\n11:58:08 $ docker top 39933416a265286e2853a5281ac686a22c1dcaf2e3d202faa6f2db62522fb1bb -eo pid,comm\n11:58:08 [Pipeline] {\n11:58:08 [Pipeline] sh\n11:58:08 + get-kubeconfig-basic\n11:58:08 Using default value for CLUSTER_API_PREFIX = api-\n11:58:08 Using default value for CLUSTER_DOMAIN = apps.lmru.tech\n11:58:08 Kubeconfig file was created.\n11:58:08 [Pipeline] sh\n11:58:09 + helm3 repo update\n11:58:09 CLUSTER: lepus-a-stage\n11:58:11 Hang tight while we grab the latest from your chart repositories...\n11:58:11 ...Successfully got an update from the \"default\" chart repository\n11:58:11 ...Successfully got an update from the \"stable\" chart repository\n11:58:11 Update Complete. ⎈Happy Helming!⎈\n11:58:11 WARNING: Kubernetes configuration file is group-readable. This is insecure. Location: /root/.kube/config\n11:58:11 WARNING: Kubernetes configuration file is world-readable. This is insecure. Location: /root/.kube/config\n11:58:11 [Pipeline] sh\n11:58:12 + test -d solution\n11:58:12 [Pipeline] sh\n11:58:12 + helm3 fetch '--untar=true' --version 2.7.0 default/solution\n11:58:12 CLUSTER: lepus-a-stage\n11:58:13 WARNING: Kubernetes configuration file is group-readable. This is insecure. Location: /root/.kube/config\n11:58:13 WARNING: Kubernetes configuration file is world-readable. This is insecure. Location: /root/.kube/config\n11:58:13 [Pipeline] sh\n11:58:13 + helm3 dep up solution\n11:58:13 CLUSTER: lepus-a-stage\n11:58:13 WARNING: Kubernetes configuration file is group-readable. This is insecure. Location: /root/.kube/config\n11:58:13 WARNING: Kubernetes configuration file is world-readable. This is insecure. Location: /root/.kube/config\n11:58:13 [Pipeline] sh\n11:58:13 + helm3 upgrade --install --atomic --wait --create-namespace -f /pwd/values.yml --set 'tag=perf' --set 'sha=6e72af3aa837ba9d3a49bd9be9131da355dec3f5' --set 'deployOnProd=false' --set 'clusterName=lepus-a-stage' --timeout 3000s --set 'imageVersion=0.0.63' --set 'environment.springProfilesActive.default=perf' --namespace detailed-solution-perf detailed-solution-perf-aggregator solution\n11:58:13 CLUSTER: lepus-a-stage\n</user_query>"}]}}
|
||
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Проверяю кластер: смотрим, на чём зависает `helm upgrade --wait` (обычно ожидание готовности подов).\n\n[REDACTED]"},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"kubectl config current-context 2>/dev/null; kubectl get pods -n detailed-solution-perf -l app=aggregator -o wide 2>&1; echo \"---\"; kubectl rollout status deploy/aggregator -n detailed-solution-perf --timeout=15s 2>&1; echo \"---\"; kubectl get rs -n detailed-solution-perf -l app=aggregator 2>&1","description":"Check aggregator pods and rollout status in perf"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"helm status detailed-solution-perf-aggregator -n detailed-solution-perf 2>&1; echo \"---\"; kubectl get events -n detailed-solution-perf --field-selector involvedObject.kind=Pod --sort-by='.lastTimestamp' 2>&1 | tail -25","description":"Helm release status and recent pod events"}}]}}
|
||
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"[REDACTED]"},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"kubectl logs -n detailed-solution-perf aggregator-dbfbffb75-dd64c --tail=80 2>&1; echo \"=== describe ===\"; kubectl describe pod -n detailed-solution-perf aggregator-dbfbffb75-dd64c 2>&1 | tail -35","description":"Logs and describe for Error pod new RS"}}]}}
|
||
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"В логах пода причина уже **явная**, это не «абстрактный Vault», а **отсутствие подставленных свойств из KV**.\n\n## Что пишет приложение\n\n```text\nCould not resolve placeholder 'vault.elastic.username' in value \"${vault.elastic.username}\"\n```\n\nПрофиль задан верно: **`perf`**. Tomcat уже поднимается, падает на создании бина `elasticsearchConfig`, потому что **`vault.elastic.*` так и не попали в Environment** — Spring не находит ни `vault.elastic.username`, ни связанных ключей.\n\nТо есть коллега формулировал верно: **к Vault (AppRole) вы, скорее всего, ходите, а нужных секретов в контексте приложения нет** — либо **политика AppRole не отдаёт чтение** `perf/detailed-solution/aggregator`, либо **в секрете нет полей** под `elastic` (имена/структура не совпадают с тем, что ждёт Spring Cloud Vault).\n\n## Важная деталь: другие учётные данные\n\nВ **новом** поде с образом `0.0.63` в `describe` видны **другие** `SPRING_ROLE_ID` / `SPRING_SECRET_ID`, чем у рабочего деплоя с `aggregator:develop` (мы раньше видели другие UUID). Значит релизный шаг **`withCredentials` + `envsubst`** подставляет **не те же** креды, что у «обычного» деплоя на perf. Если у этой пары **нет read на perf KV** или секрет другой — получите ровно такую ошибку.\n\n## Почему «зависает» Helm\n\n`helm upgrade --wait` ждёт, пока новые поды станут Ready. Они **в CrashLoopBackOff** из‑за падения JVM → таймаут до **3000s**, как в прошлый раз.\n\n## Что делать (по смыслу, без правок кода в репо)\n\n1. **Vault (namespace `aao`)** \n - Проверить, что по пути **`perf/detailed-solution/aggregator`** есть данные для `elastic` (username/password), в том формате, который ожидает Spring Vault для вашего KV. \n - Проверить **политику AppRole**, которую подставляет **именно релизный** Jenkins credential для шага «deploy on perf» — **read** на этот путь.\n\n2. **Jenkins** \n - Сравнить **credential id** для `SPRING_ROLE_ID` / `SPRING_SECRET_ID` в релизном perf-деплое и в успешном «только perf» job — они должны быть эквивалентны по доступу к **perf**.\n\n3. **Быстрая проверка** \n - С теми же Role/Secret ID, что в упавшем поде, локально или через Vault CLI: **прочитать** `perf/detailed-solution/aggregator` и убедиться, что там есть ключи под elastic.\n\nИтог: это **согласование доступа AppRole к perf KV и содержимого секрета**, плюс **выравнивание кредов** между релизным и обычным perf-деплоем; падение в коде/образе здесь вторично — падает из‑за неразрешённых `${vault.elastic.username}`.\n\n[REDACTED]"}]}}
|
||
{"role":"user","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"<user_query>\nperf/detailed-solution/aggregator\n{\n \"app-users-password\": {\n \"admin\": \"todo\",\n \"note\": \"It's stored only in db, the app doesn't read it from here\",\n \"state-manager\": \"todo\"\n },\n \"basic.user\": {\n \"password\": \"123\",\n \"username\": \"est\"\n },\n \"vault\": {\n \"elastic\": {\n \"password\": \"123\",\n \"username\": \"stic\"\n },\n \"kafka\": {\n \"password\": \"123\",\n \"username\": \"olution-all\"\n },\n \"kafka-ha\": {\n \"password\": \"132\",\n \"username\": \"detailed\"\n }\n }\n}\n</user_query>"}]}}
|
||
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Структура секрета, которую вы показали, **как раз подходит** под то, что ждёт приложение: вложенный объект `vault.elastic.username` / `password` в Spring обычно превращается в свойства `vault.elastic.username` и `vault.elastic.password`. С точки зрения **формата данных** тут всё согласовано с `application.yml` (`${vault.elastic.username}` и т.д.).\n\nЗначит вывод из логов нужно уточнить так:\n\n## 1. Данные в Vault есть — но **под с тем токеном, с которым вы смотрите UI**\n\nВ UI вы видите содержимое **под своей учёткой** или под политикой админа. В поде же используются **другие** `SPRING_ROLE_ID` / `SPRING_SECRET_ID` из Jenkins (`withCredentials` + `envsubst`). Если у **этого** AppRole нет `read` на `perf/.../detailed-solution/aggregator` (или только на `preprod`, а не на `perf`), ответ Vault для приложения будет **пустой** — и Spring честно пишет: placeholder `vault.elastic.username` не разрешён.\n\nТо есть противоречия нет: **секрет в Vault заполнен**, но **релизный пайплайн подставляет креды, которые этот секрет не читают**.\n\n## 2. Проверка «на земле»\n\nИмеет смысл одним из способов **с теми же Role ID / Secret ID**, что попали в упавший под (или из того же Jenkins credential), выполнить чтение пути и посмотреть **сырое тело** ответа (например `vault kv get -mount=perf detailed-solution/aggregator` в нужном namespace). Если там пусто или 403 — проблема в **политике AppRole**, не в JSON.\n\n## 3. Мелочь по содержимому\n\nУ вас в примере пароли выглядят как заглушки (`todo`, `123`) — для **реального** perf это может быть отдельная тема (доступ к Elastic/Kafka), но **ошибка `Could not resolve placeholder`** возникает раньше: свойства вообще не подставляются, то есть дело именно в **доставке секрета в приложение**, а не в том, что `stic`/`123` неверны для Elasticsearch.\n\n**Итог:** показанный JSON не опровергает диагноз — он подтверждает, что **путь и структура в принципе верные**. Нужно выровнять **доступ AppRole из релизного шага** с тем, что используется при успешном «чистом» perf-деплое, либо расширить политику для релизных кредов на `perf/detailed-solution/aggregator`.\n\n[REDACTED]"}]}}
|
||
{"role":"user","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"<user_query>\nдобавили прав апроли, прошло\nтеперь новая ошибка\n+ helm3 upgrade --install --atomic --wait --create-namespace -f /pwd/values.yml --set 'tag=perf' --set 'sha=6e72af3aa837ba9d3a49bd9be9131da355dec3f5' --set 'deployOnProd=false' --set 'clusterName=lepus-a-stage' --timeout 3000s --set 'imageVersion=0.0.63' --set 'environment.springProfilesActive.default=perf' --namespace detailed-solution-perf detailed-solution-perf-aggregator solution\n11:58:13 CLUSTER: lepus-a-stage\n12:16:09 Release \"detailed-solution-perf-aggregator\" has been upgraded. Happy Helming!\n12:16:09 NAME: detailed-solution-perf-aggregator\n12:16:09 LAST DEPLOYED: Wed Apr 8 11:58:13 2026\n12:16:09 NAMESPACE: detailed-solution-perf\n12:16:09 STATUS: deployed\n12:16:09 REVISION: 10\n12:16:09 TEST SUITE: None\n12:16:09 NOTES:\n12:16:09 Kotanam Slava!\n12:16:09 WARNING: Kubernetes configuration file is group-readable. This is insecure. Location: /root/.kube/config\n12:16:09 WARNING: Kubernetes configuration file is world-readable. This is insecure. Location: /root/.kube/config\n12:16:09 Result of the deployment is saved to CMDB.\n12:16:09 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:09 $ docker stop --time=1 39933416a265286e2853a5281ac686a22c1dcaf2e3d202faa6f2db62522fb1bb\n12:16:13 $ docker rm -f --volumes 39933416a265286e2853a5281ac686a22c1dcaf2e3d202faa6f2db62522fb1bb\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] // withDockerContainer\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] // withEnv\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] // withCredentials\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] // stage\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] parallel\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] { (Branch: Kubedog lepus-a-stage)\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] withCredentials\n12:16:13 Masking supported pattern matches of $USERNAME or $PASSWORD\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] {\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] withEnv\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] {\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] isUnix\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] withEnv\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] {\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] sh\n12:16:14 + docker pull docker.art.lmru.tech/img-k8s-deployer:latest\n12:16:14 latest: Pulling from img-k8s-deployer\n12:16:14 Digest: sha256:3528ee39a8506c5b88c6a34d70b3bc9edd8fbd1360bfa88364a1a5bb340a5912\n12:16:14 Status: Image is up to date for docker.art.lmru.tech/img-k8s-deployer:latest\n12:16:14 docker.art.lmru.tech/img-k8s-deployer:latest\n12:16:14 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:14 [Pipeline] // withEnv\n12:16:14 [Pipeline] pwd\n12:16:14 [Pipeline] isUnix\n12:16:14 [Pipeline] withEnv\n12:16:14 [Pipeline] {\n12:16:14 [Pipeline] sh\n12:16:14 + docker inspect -f . docker.art.lmru.tech/img-k8s-deployer:latest\n12:16:14 .\n12:16:14 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:14 [Pipeline] // withEnv\n12:16:14 [Pipeline] withDockerContainer\n12:16:14 p-jenkins-node-m-17 does not seem to be running inside a container\n12:16:14 $ docker run -t -d -u 0:0 -u root -v /data/jenkins-root/workspace/led-solution--aggregator_develop:/pwd -w /data/jenkins-root/workspace/led-solution--aggregator_develop -v /data/jenkins-root/workspace/led-solution--aggregator_develop:/data/jenkins-root/workspace/led-solution--aggregator_develop:rw,z -v /data/jenkins-root/workspace/led-solution--aggregator_develop@tmp:/data/jenkins-root/workspace/led-solution--aggregator_develop@tmp:rw,z -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** docker.art.lmru.tech/img-k8s-deployer:latest cat\n12:16:15 $ docker top 78b2caa904b14763cadfa681fbecbfc958b90c4a6c6a1823223ae768a5a296a9 -eo pid,comm\n12:16:15 [Pipeline] {\n12:16:15 [Pipeline] sh\n12:16:15 + get-kubeconfig-basic\n12:16:15 Using default value for CLUSTER_API_PREFIX = api-\n12:16:15 Using default value for CLUSTER_DOMAIN = apps.lmru.tech\n12:16:15 Kubeconfig file was created.\n12:16:15 [Pipeline] sh\n12:16:15 + echo '{\"Deployments\": [{\"ResourceName\": \"aggregator\", \"Namespace\": \"detailed-solution-perf\"}]}'\n12:16:15 + kubedog multitrack --timeout 300\n12:16:17 ┌ Status progress\n12:16:17 │ DEPLOYMENT REPLICAS AVAILABLE UP-TO-DATE \n12:16:17 │ aggregator 9/9 9 9 \n12:16:17 │ │ POD READY RESTARTS STATUS \n12:16:17 │ └── dbfbffb75-fmsk6 1/1 8 Running \n12:16:17 └ Status progress\n12:16:17 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:17 $ docker stop --time=1 78b2caa904b14763cadfa681fbecbfc958b90c4a6c6a1823223ae768a5a296a9\n12:16:19 $ docker rm -f --volumes 78b2caa904b14763cadfa681fbecbfc958b90c4a6c6a1823223ae768a5a296a9\n12:16:19 [Pipeline] // withDockerContainer\n12:16:19 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:19 [Pipeline] // withEnv\n12:16:19 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:19 [Pipeline] // withCredentials\n12:16:19 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:19 [Pipeline] // parallel\n12:16:19 [Pipeline] sh\n12:16:19 + git describe --abbrev=0 --tags 0.0.63^ --always\n12:16:19 [Pipeline] sh\n12:16:20 + git log --oneline 0.0.62...0.0.63\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] echo\n12:16:20 JIRA tasks were found between tags 0.0.62 - 0.0.63 : []\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] echo\n12:16:20 ================ END DEPLOY ================\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] // stage\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] stage\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] { (Call load tests)\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] echo\n12:16:20 ================ START RUN LOAD TESTS ================\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] echo\n12:16:20 Run gatling load tests: name aao/tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-load-tests, branch: master, params: [[node:lmru-dockerhost, baseUrl:https://detailed-solution-perf-lepus-a-stage.apps.lmru.tech/aggregator, restRps:400, rabbitMps:154, rise:5, duration:20, class:ru.leroymerlin.qa.test.CrawlerAndAggregatorSimulation]]\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] build\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] echo\n12:16:20 Load tests failed\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] echo\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] stage\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] { (Copy Gatling report)\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] copyArtifacts\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] // stage\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] // stage\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] echo\n12:16:20 hudson.AbortException: Unable to find project for artifact copy: aao/tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-load-tests\n12:16:20 This may be due to incorrect project name or permission settings; see help for project name in job configuration.\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] withCredentials\n12:16:20 Masking supported pattern matches of $STAGE_CHAT_ID\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] {\n12:16:21 [Pipeline] withCredentials\n12:16:21 Masking supported pattern matches of $TOKEN\n12:16:21 [Pipeline] {\n12:16:21 [Pipeline] catchError\n12:16:21 [Pipeline] {\n12:16:21 [Pipeline] retry\n12:16:22 [Pipeline] {\n12:16:22 [Pipeline] httpRequest\n12:16:22 Warning: A secret was passed to \"httpRequest\" using Groovy String interpolation, which is insecure.\n12:16:22 \t\t Affected argument(s) used the following variable(s): [TOKEN]\n12:16:22 \t\t See https://jenkins.io/redirect/groovy-string-interpolation for details.\n12:16:22 HttpMethod: POST\n12:16:22 URL: https://lemanapro.loop.ru/api/v4/posts\n12:16:22 Content-Type: application/json; charset=UTF-8\n12:16:22 Accept: application/json\n12:16:22 Authorization: *****\n12:16:22 Sending request to url: https://lemanapro.loop.ru/api/v4/posts\n12:16:22 Response Code: 201\n12:16:22 Success: Status code 201 is in the accepted range: 100:399\n12:16:22 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:22 [Pipeline] // retry\n12:16:22 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:22 [Pipeline] // catchError\n12:16:22 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:22 [Pipeline] // withCredentials\n12:16:22 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:22 [Pipeline] // withCredentials\n12:16:22 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:22 [Pipeline] // node\n12:16:22 [Pipeline] End of Pipeline\n12:16:22 ERROR: Unable to find project for artifact copy: aao/tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-load-tests\n12:16:22 This may be due to incorrect project name or permission settings; see help for project name in job configuration.\n12:16:23 \n12:16:23 GitHub has been notified of this commit’s build result\n12:16:23 \n12:16:23 Finished: FAILURE\n</user_query>"}]}}
|
||
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Деплой **уже прошёл успешно** — это видно по строкам:\n\n```text\nRelease \"detailed-solution-perf-aggregator\" has been upgraded. Happy Helming!\nSTATUS: deployed\n```\n\nKubedog тоже отработал: `aggregator 9/9`, `9 AVAILABLE`.\n\n## В чём новая ошибка\n\nПайплайн падает **после** деплоя, на шаге **нагрузочных тестов и копирования отчёта**:\n\n1. `Load tests failed` — downstream job нагрузочных тестов не дал успешного результата (или не отработал как ожидается).\n2. Затем шаг **`copyArtifacts`** ищет job по пути \n **`aao/tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-load-tests`** \n и не находит его:\n\n```text\nUnable to find project for artifact copy: aao/tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-load-tests\nThis may be due to incorrect project name or permission settings\n```\n\nТо есть это **не Kubernetes и не приложение**, а **Jenkins**: либо job с таким полным именем не существует / переименован / в другом folder, либо у job’а, который крутит пайплайн, **нет прав** видеть/копировать артефакты из этого проекта.\n\n## Что сделать\n\n1. В Jenkins открыть **точный URL** job’а нагрузочных тестов и сравнить путь с тем, что в `Jenkinsfile` (`loadTests.testJobName`: `aao/tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-load-tests`). Если путь другой — поправить имя в конфиге пайплайна (или переименовать job в Jenkins).\n2. Проверить **права** (Matrix/Role strategy): у сервисной учётки / пользователя, под которым идёт сборка, должен быть доступ к этому job’у и к артефактам.\n3. Открыть **сам build** `aao/tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-load-tests` за это время — понять, почему он «failed» (тесты упали, job disabled, параметры и т.д.).\n\nИтог: **релизный деплой в perf вы исправили**; текущий `FAILURE` — из‑за **конфигурации/доступа к Jenkins job нагрузочных тестов** (и, возможно, из‑за падения самого прогона Gatling), а не из‑за Helm или Vault.\n\n[REDACTED]"}]}}
|
||
{"role":"user","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"<user_query>\nточный урл https://jenkins.lmru.tech/job/aao/job/Tests/job/detailed-solution-aggregator-load-tests/ \n</user_query>"}]}}
|
||
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Путь в конфиге указан как `aao/tests/...` (нижний регистр), а реальная папка — `Tests`. Обновляю `testJobName` в `Jenkinsfile`.\n\n[REDACTED]"},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Read","input":{"path":"/home/ruslanpi/Documents/repos/lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator/Jenkinsfile"}}]}}
|
||
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"[REDACTED]"},{"type":"tool_use","name":"StrReplace","input":{"path":"/home/ruslanpi/Documents/repos/lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator/Jenkinsfile","old_string":" \"testJobName\": \"aao/tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-load-tests\",","new_string":" \"testJobName\": \"aao/Tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-load-tests\","}}]}}
|
||
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"[REDACTED]"},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Grep","input":{"path":"/home/ruslanpi/Documents/repos/lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator","pattern":"detailed-solution-aggregator-functional"}}]}}
|
||
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Обновляю путь к functional-tests: он в той же папке `Tests`.\n\n[REDACTED]"},{"type":"tool_use","name":"StrReplace","input":{"path":"/home/ruslanpi/Documents/repos/lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator/Jenkinsfile","old_string":" \"testJobName\": \"aao/tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-functional-tests\"","new_string":" \"testJobName\": \"aao/Tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-functional-tests\""}}]}}
|
||
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Откатываю изменение functional-tests — подтверждён только URL нагрузочных тестов.\n\n[REDACTED]"},{"type":"tool_use","name":"StrReplace","input":{"path":"/home/ruslanpi/Documents/repos/lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator/Jenkinsfile","old_string":" \"testJobName\": \"aao/Tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-functional-tests\"","new_string":" \"testJobName\": \"aao/tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-functional-tests\""}}]}}
|
||
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Готово.\n\n**Что было не так:** в `Jenkinsfile` был путь `aao/tests/...` (нижний регистр), а в Jenkins папка называется **`Tests`**, как в URL \n`.../job/aao/job/Tests/job/detailed-solution-aggregator-load-tests/`.\n\n**Что сделано:** для `loadTests` указано:\n\n`aao/Tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-load-tests`\n\nФункциональные тесты оставлены как `aao/tests/...` — вы дали точный URL только для load tests. Если при прогоне функциональных тестов снова будет «Unable to find project», проверьте их job в Jenkins и при необходимости замените на `aao/Tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-functional-tests` по тому же принципу.\n\n[REDACTED]"}]}} |