Files
cursor-chat-archive/repos/lmru-detailed-solution-aggregator/agent-transcripts/ad1bc68a-29c8-40c6-8bdf-89dc5e75fb0c/ad1bc68a-29c8-40c6-8bdf-89dc5e75fb0c.jsonl
T
Ruslan PiatrovichandCursor 532ac723cb Add full Cursor chat archive for Documents/repos workspaces.
Includes global state.vscdb, per-repo transcripts, workspace storage,
composer exports, and restore scripts for a new machine.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2026-06-04 11:53:07 +03:00

29 lines
82 KiB
JSON
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
{"role":"user","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"<user_query>\n\t\nРуслан Исанбаев\n3 часа назад\n@lmru-devops-bot Коллеги, привет. Можете помочь понять почему не собирается релиз? https://jenkins.lmru.tech/job/aao/job/lmru-solution/job/lmru--detailed-solution/job/lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator/job/develop/\n\n4 ответа\nНовые сообщения\n\nlmru-devops-bot\nБОТ\n3 часа назад\nYour request has been registered: DOA-5556\n\n\t\nlmru-devops-bot\nБОТ\n-3 ч\n@Руслан Петрович\nПРАВИЛА ОБРАЩЕНИЯ:\n\n⏳ Дежурный ответит на обращение в течении рабочих часов (c 10 до 19 МСК)\n:kubernetes: По вопросам Kubernetes кластеров обращайтесь в канал ~lmru-k8s-platform-support (бот lmru-k8s-platform-bot)\n:warning: При критичном инциденте на проде можете эскалировать обращение по инструкции\n\nРуслан Исанбаев\n3 часа назад\nПри сборке релиза в препрод, есть шаг сдеелать деплой в perf среду, на этом этапе в кубе под уходит рестарт так как не видит секреты в волте, к самому волту подключается при этом. Если запустить сборку не релизную, а чисто на perf или другие среды, проблем нет и всё собирается.\n</user_query>"}]}}
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Разбираемся: при релизной сборке деплой в perf падает из‑за секретов в Vault, при обычной сборке на perf — нет. Ищем в репозитории различия между релизным и нерелизным пайплайном и настройками Vault.\n\n[REDACTED]"},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Glob","input":{"target_directory":"/home/ruslanpi/Documents/repos/lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator","glob_pattern":"**/*Jenkins*"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Glob","input":{"target_directory":"/home/ruslanpi/Documents/repos/lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator","glob_pattern":"**/*.jenkins*"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Grep","input":{"path":"/home/ruslanpi/Documents/repos/lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator","pattern":"vault|Vault|secret","glob":"*.{yml,yaml,groovy,jenkinsfile,Jenkinsfile}","-i":true}}]}}
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"[REDACTED]"},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Read","input":{"path":"/home/ruslanpi/Documents/repos/lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator/Jenkinsfile"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Read","input":{"path":"/home/ruslanpi/Documents/repos/lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator/values.yml"}}]}}
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"[REDACTED]"},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Read","input":{"path":"/home/ruslanpi/Documents/repos/lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator/src/main/resources/application.yml"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Read","input":{"path":"/home/ruslanpi/Documents/repos/lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator/src/main/resources/application-perf.yml"}}]}}
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"[REDACTED]"},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Grep","input":{"path":"/home/ruslanpi/Documents/repos/lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator","pattern":"release|perf|preprod|SPRING_","glob":"*.{md,yml,yaml}"}}]}}
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"В репозитории видно только обёртку пайплайна и конфиг приложения; сам сценарий «релиз → препрод → perf» живёт в **общих библиотеках** `solution-utils` / `common-utils` (см. `Jenkinsfile`), поэтому точную причину по коду этого репо не доказать — зато можно сузить круг проверок и объяснить типичные расхождения «релиз vs обычная сборка на perf».\n\n## Что важно в этом сервисе\n\nПри профиле **perf** Vault настроен так:\n\n```20:26:src/main/resources/application-perf.yml\nspring:\n cloud:\n vault:\n kv:\n backend: perf\n config:\n import: \"vault://perf/detailed-solution/aggregator\"\n```\n\nАутентификация — **AppRole** через переменные окружения:\n\n```21:29:src/main/resources/application.yml\n vault:\n ...\n authentication: approle\n namespace: aao\n app-role:\n role-id: ${SPRING_ROLE_ID}\n secret-id: ${SPRING_SECRET_ID}\n```\n\nТо есть для успешного старта нужны одновременно: **корректный Spring-профиль (`perf`)**, **доступ AppRole к KV `perf/.../detailed-solution/aggregator`**, и **реально выданные в под `SPRING_ROLE_ID` / `SPRING_SECRET_ID`** (в Helm они завязаны на `${SPRING_ROLE_ID}` / `${SPRING_SECRET_ID}` в `values.yml`).\n\nФраза «к Vault подключается, а секретов не видит» обычно означает не сетевой обрыв, а одно из: **успешный логин, но 403/404 на чтение KV**, **пустой/не тот путь**, **не тот профиль → другой `config.import`**, или **секрет в Kubernetes ещё не подставил значения в env**.\n\n## Почему так бывает именно на релизе, а не на «чистом» perf\n\n1. **Другие параметры шага деплоя** \n Релизный job часто передаёт другие `helm`-параметры: тег образа, `SPRING_PROFILES_ACTIVE`, имя/namespace секрета, override кластера. Любая ошибка вроде `preprod` вместо `perf` приведёт к попытке читать `vault://preprod/...` при деплое в perf (или наоборот) — симптомы похожи на «Vault есть, данных нет».\n\n2. **Другие Jenkins credentials** \n На шаге «деплой в perf» в релизной ветке может подставляться **другой** credential id для `SPRING_SECRET_ID` / роли, чем в job «собрать только perf». Тогда AppRole реально логинится, но **политика не даёт читать `perf/detailed-solution/aggregator`**.\n\n3. **Порядок и гонки** \n В цепочке «сначала препрод, потом perf» возможны сценарии, когда perf поднимается **до** готовности K8s-секрета/ExternalSecret или до обновления значений после предыдущего шага — на отдельном perf-job такого шага нет.\n\n4. **Масштаб и наблюдаемость** \n В `values.yml` для **perf** задано **4 реплики** и включён autoscaling — при проблеме со стартом рестартов «видно» больше, чем на среде с 1–2 репликами.\n\n## Что проверить по фактам (для DevOps / в тикете DOA-5556)\n\n- Логи приложения при падении: строки Spring Vault / `SecretNotFound` / `403` / `Permission denied` и **какой именно путь** запрашивается. \n- В шаге деплоя релиза на perf: **`SPRING_PROFILES_ACTIVE` содержит `perf`**, нет ли лишнего `preprod`. \n- Сравнить **rendered Helm values** или манифест пода между успешным perf-job и неуспешным релизом: **одинаковые ли env** для `SPRING_ROLE_ID`, `SPRING_SECRET_ID`, профиля. \n- В Vault: для **того же AppRole**, что использует релизный деплой, есть ли **read** на `perf/detailed-solution/aggregator` (и нужный KV engine/backend `perf`).\n\nИтого: в коде сервиса путь к секретам для perf зафиксирован и согласован; расхождение почти наверняка в **пайплайне/секретах Jenkins/Helm для релизного шага**, а не в самом `application-perf.yml`. Точный ответ даст сравнение логов и параметров двух job’ов плюс политики Vault для релизного AppRole — это как раз зона ответа дежурного DevOps по DOA-5556.\n\n[REDACTED]"}]}}
{"role":"user","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"<user_query>\n07:44:36 Extracting: BOOT-INF/lib/spring-security-core-5.7.11.jar -> /data/jenkins-root/workspace/d-solution--aggregator_develop_2/target/application/BOOT-INF/lib/spring-security-core-5.7.11.jar\n07:44:36 Extracting: BOOT-INF/lib/spring-security-crypto-5.7.11.jar -> /data/jenkins-root/workspace/d-solution--aggregator_develop_2/target/application/BOOT-INF/lib/spring-security-crypto-5.7.11.jar\n07:44:36 Extracting: BOOT-INF/lib/spring-boot-jarmode-layertools-2.7.18.jar -> /data/jenkins-root/workspace/d-solution--aggregator_develop_2/target/application/BOOT-INF/lib/spring-boot-jarmode-layertools-2.7.18.jar\n07:44:36 Extracting: BOOT-INF/classpath.idx -> /data/jenkins-root/workspace/d-solution--aggregator_develop_2/target/application/BOOT-INF/classpath.idx\n07:44:36 Extracting: BOOT-INF/layers.idx -> /data/jenkins-root/workspace/d-solution--aggregator_develop_2/target/application/BOOT-INF/layers.idx\n07:44:36 Extracted: 418 files\n07:44:36 [Pipeline] sh\n07:44:36 + test -f target/application/org/springframework/boot/loader/launch/JarLauncher.class\n07:44:36 [Pipeline] sh\n07:44:36 + echo FROM docker.art.lmru.tech/devops/base-image/java:liberica-17jdk\n07:44:36 [Pipeline] sh\n07:44:37 + echo ENV MAIN_CLASS=org.springframework.boot.loader.JarLauncher\n07:44:37 [Pipeline] newArtifactoryServer\n07:44:37 [Pipeline] isUnix\n07:44:37 [Pipeline] withEnv\n07:44:37 [Pipeline] {\n07:44:37 [Pipeline] sh\n07:44:37 + docker build -t docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:0.0.62 -t docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:0.0.62-SNAPSHOT -f Dockerfile target/application --pull\n07:44:38 #0 building with \"default\" instance using docker driver\n07:44:38 \n07:44:38 #1 [internal] load build definition from Dockerfile\n07:44:38 #1 transferring dockerfile: 160B done\n07:44:38 #1 DONE 0.0s\n07:44:38 \n07:44:38 #2 [internal] load metadata for docker.art.lmru.tech/devops/base-image/java:liberica-17jdk\n07:44:38 #2 DONE 0.4s\n07:44:38 \n07:44:38 #3 [internal] load .dockerignore\n07:44:38 #3 transferring context: 2B done\n07:44:38 #3 DONE 0.0s\n07:44:38 \n07:44:38 #4 [1/1] FROM docker.art.lmru.tech/devops/base-image/java:liberica-17jdk@sha256:212df2894e2ebced42ca3219df4c68c9ddec8326dae1d24ff65125b55ad42448\n07:44:38 #4 resolve docker.art.lmru.tech/devops/base-image/java:liberica-17jdk@sha256:212df2894e2ebced42ca3219df4c68c9ddec8326dae1d24ff65125b55ad42448 0.0s done\n07:44:38 #4 sha256:212df2894e2ebced42ca3219df4c68c9ddec8326dae1d24ff65125b55ad42448 1.58kB / 1.58kB done\n07:44:38 #4 sha256:6361e9ad633b2b602831cad9a0565f4f71b96bcd72e77504dba7c01fb5218166 19.57kB / 19.57kB done\n07:44:38 #4 sha256:3e2c9e5d2469bbd5bc12826de59dab4023c98b13b6ddc846440d3e4b68603a56 3.93MB / 3.93MB 0.1s done\n07:44:38 #4 sha256:9d4743213fb760567c24f247ad2f144887554fcfa4a091efc23cc8def8c4529a 10.53MB / 76.81MB 0.2s\n07:44:38 #4 sha256:9183d98ec0d901793fbfc3317e6054c7ee8e7ec85f1b1caa12233f311d088a9f 24.44kB / 24.44kB 0.1s done\n07:44:38 #4 sha256:ef51ceeeea20e20f34053ef4a94cfcaa8387318a6f73294bfbbcbccd4e62efcc 296B / 296B 0.0s done\n07:44:38 #4 sha256:8accd28a1fcd7f337fc02ecff5fa9e08d837bda544322bdebc0b411b1d40e4ee 7.34MB / 12.52MB 0.2s\n07:44:38 #4 extracting sha256:3e2c9e5d2469bbd5bc12826de59dab4023c98b13b6ddc846440d3e4b68603a56\n07:44:38 #4 sha256:9d4743213fb760567c24f247ad2f144887554fcfa4a091efc23cc8def8c4529a 17.83MB / 76.81MB 0.3s\n07:44:38 #4 sha256:8accd28a1fcd7f337fc02ecff5fa9e08d837bda544322bdebc0b411b1d40e4ee 12.52MB / 12.52MB 0.3s\n07:44:38 #4 sha256:9d4743213fb760567c24f247ad2f144887554fcfa4a091efc23cc8def8c4529a 27.26MB / 76.81MB 0.4s\n07:44:38 #4 sha256:8accd28a1fcd7f337fc02ecff5fa9e08d837bda544322bdebc0b411b1d40e4ee 12.52MB / 12.52MB 0.3s done\n07:44:38 #4 extracting sha256:3e2c9e5d2469bbd5bc12826de59dab4023c98b13b6ddc846440d3e4b68603a56 0.2s done\n07:44:38 #4 sha256:9d4743213fb760567c24f247ad2f144887554fcfa4a091efc23cc8def8c4529a 42.99MB / 76.81MB 0.5s\n07:44:38 #4 sha256:9d4743213fb760567c24f247ad2f144887554fcfa4a091efc23cc8def8c4529a 68.19MB / 76.81MB 0.7s\n07:44:39 #4 sha256:9d4743213fb760567c24f247ad2f144887554fcfa4a091efc23cc8def8c4529a 76.81MB / 76.81MB 0.8s\n07:44:39 #4 sha256:9d4743213fb760567c24f247ad2f144887554fcfa4a091efc23cc8def8c4529a 76.81MB / 76.81MB 0.8s done\n07:44:39 #4 extracting sha256:9d4743213fb760567c24f247ad2f144887554fcfa4a091efc23cc8def8c4529a\n07:44:40 #4 ...\n07:44:40 \n07:44:40 #5 [internal] load build context\n07:44:40 #5 transferring context: 118.95MB 1.8s done\n07:44:40 #5 DONE 1.8s\n07:44:40 \n07:44:40 #4 [1/1] FROM docker.art.lmru.tech/devops/base-image/java:liberica-17jdk@sha256:212df2894e2ebced42ca3219df4c68c9ddec8326dae1d24ff65125b55ad42448\n07:44:40 #4 extracting sha256:9d4743213fb760567c24f247ad2f144887554fcfa4a091efc23cc8def8c4529a 1.4s done\n07:44:40 #4 extracting sha256:9183d98ec0d901793fbfc3317e6054c7ee8e7ec85f1b1caa12233f311d088a9f done\n07:44:40 #4 extracting sha256:ef51ceeeea20e20f34053ef4a94cfcaa8387318a6f73294bfbbcbccd4e62efcc done\n07:44:40 #4 extracting sha256:8accd28a1fcd7f337fc02ecff5fa9e08d837bda544322bdebc0b411b1d40e4ee\n07:44:41 #4 extracting sha256:8accd28a1fcd7f337fc02ecff5fa9e08d837bda544322bdebc0b411b1d40e4ee 0.4s done\n07:44:41 #4 DONE 3.1s\n07:44:41 \n07:44:41 #6 [2/5] ONBUILD ADD ./org /application/org\n07:44:41 #6 DONE 0.3s\n07:44:41 \n07:44:41 #7 [3/5] ONBUILD ADD ./BOOT-INF/lib /application/BOOT-INF/lib\n07:44:41 #7 DONE 0.4s\n07:44:42 \n07:44:42 #8 [4/5] ONBUILD ADD ./BOOT-INF/classes /application/BOOT-INF/classes\n07:44:42 #8 DONE 0.1s\n07:44:42 \n07:44:42 #9 [5/5] ONBUILD ADD ./META-INF /application/META-INF\n07:44:42 #9 DONE 0.0s\n07:44:42 \n07:44:42 #10 exporting to image\n07:44:42 #10 exporting layers\n07:44:42 #10 exporting layers 0.7s done\n07:44:42 #10 writing image sha256:8348246b19b9628c69945e2e9f1f2345948d3c439d292079127a0ff40a025f42 done\n07:44:42 #10 naming to docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:0.0.62 done\n07:44:42 #10 naming to docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:0.0.62-SNAPSHOT done\n07:44:42 #10 DONE 0.7s\n07:44:42 [Pipeline] }\n07:44:42 [Pipeline] // withEnv\n07:44:42 [Pipeline] newBuildInfo\n07:44:42 [Pipeline] echo\n07:44:42 Building docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:0.0.62 image\n07:44:43 [Pipeline] newBuildInfo\n07:44:43 [Pipeline] dockerPushStep\n07:44:43 Executing command: /bin/sh -c git log --pretty=format:%s -1\n07:44:44 [d-solution--aggregator_develop_2] $ java -Djava.io.tmpdir=/data/jenkins-root/workspace/d-solution--aggregator_develop_2@tmp/artifactory/javatmpdir -cp /data/jenkins-root/workspace/d-solution--aggregator_develop_2@tmp/artifactory/cache/artifactory-plugin/4.0.8/* org.jfrog.build.extractor.docker.extractor.DockerPush\n07:44:45 Apr 08, 2026 4:44:45 AM org.jfrog.build.extractor.packageManager.PackageManagerLogger info\n07:44:45 INFO: Pushing image: docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:0.0.62\n07:44:58 Apr 08, 2026 4:44:58 AM org.jfrog.build.extractor.packageManager.PackageManagerLogger info\n07:44:58 INFO: Searching manifest for image \"docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:0.0.62\" in \"https://art.lmru.tech/artifactory\" under \"docker-local-aao\" repository\n07:44:58 Apr 08, 2026 4:44:58 AM org.jfrog.build.extractor.packageManager.PackageManagerLogger info\n07:44:58 INFO: Searching manifest in path: docker-local-aao/aggregator/0.0.62\n07:44:58 Apr 08, 2026 4:44:58 AM org.jfrog.build.extractor.packageManager.PackageManagerLogger info\n07:44:58 INFO: Trying to download manifest from docker-local-aao/aggregator/0.0.62/manifest.json\n07:44:59 Apr 08, 2026 4:44:59 AM org.jfrog.build.extractor.packageManager.PackageManagerLogger info\n07:44:59 INFO: Fetching details of published docker layers from Artifactory...\n07:45:01 Apr 08, 2026 4:45:01 AM org.jfrog.build.extractor.packageManager.PackageManagerLogger info\n07:45:01 INFO: Successfully pushed docker image: docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:0.0.62\n07:45:02 [Pipeline] sh\n07:45:02 + docker rmi docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:0.0.62\n07:45:02 Untagged: docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:0.0.62\n07:45:02 [Pipeline] echo\n07:45:02 Building docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:0.0.62-SNAPSHOT image\n07:45:02 [Pipeline] newBuildInfo\n07:45:02 [Pipeline] dockerPushStep\n07:45:02 [d-solution--aggregator_develop_2] $ java -Djava.io.tmpdir=/data/jenkins-root/workspace/d-solution--aggregator_develop_2@tmp/artifactory/javatmpdir -cp /data/jenkins-root/workspace/d-solution--aggregator_develop_2@tmp/artifactory/cache/artifactory-plugin/4.0.8/* org.jfrog.build.extractor.docker.extractor.DockerPush\n07:45:02 Executing command: /bin/sh -c git log --pretty=format:%s -1\n07:45:02 Apr 08, 2026 4:45:02 AM org.jfrog.build.extractor.packageManager.PackageManagerLogger info\n07:45:02 INFO: Pushing image: docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:0.0.62-SNAPSHOT\n07:45:03 Apr 08, 2026 4:45:03 AM org.jfrog.build.extractor.packageManager.PackageManagerLogger info\n07:45:03 INFO: Searching manifest for image \"docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:0.0.62-SNAPSHOT\" in \"https://art.lmru.tech/artifactory\" under \"docker-local-aao\" repository\n07:45:03 Apr 08, 2026 4:45:03 AM org.jfrog.build.extractor.packageManager.PackageManagerLogger info\n07:45:03 INFO: Searching manifest in path: docker-local-aao/aggregator/0.0.62-SNAPSHOT\n07:45:03 Apr 08, 2026 4:45:03 AM org.jfrog.build.extractor.packageManager.PackageManagerLogger info\n07:45:03 INFO: Trying to download manifest from docker-local-aao/aggregator/0.0.62-SNAPSHOT/manifest.json\n07:45:04 Apr 08, 2026 4:45:04 AM org.jfrog.build.extractor.packageManager.PackageManagerLogger info\n07:45:04 INFO: Fetching details of published docker layers from Artifactory...\n07:45:07 Apr 08, 2026 4:45:07 AM org.jfrog.build.extractor.packageManager.PackageManagerLogger info\n07:45:07 INFO: Successfully pushed docker image: docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:0.0.62-SNAPSHOT\n07:45:07 [Pipeline] sh\n07:45:07 + docker rmi docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:0.0.62-SNAPSHOT\n07:45:07 Untagged: docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:0.0.62-SNAPSHOT\n07:45:07 Untagged: docker-local-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator@sha256:4b58fd1c3702113066dbb6de157382e5a8e2f63024f3ee344aa17295a81497f3\n07:45:07 Deleted: sha256:8348246b19b9628c69945e2e9f1f2345948d3c439d292079127a0ff40a025f42\n07:45:07 [Pipeline] publishBuildInfo\n07:45:07 Deploying build info...\n07:45:08 Build-info successfully deployed. Browse it in Artifactory under https://art.lmru.tech/artifactory/webapp/builds/aao%20%3A%3A%20lmru-solution%20%3A%3A%20lmru--detailed-solution%20%3A%3A%20lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator%20%3A%3A%20develop/4\n07:45:08 Sending async request for build retention, deleting build artifacts, min build date: Wed Apr 01 07:45:07 MSK 2026.\n07:45:08 [Pipeline] artifactoryPromoteBuild\n07:45:08 Promoting 'aao :: lmru-solution :: lmru--detailed-solution :: lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator :: develop' #4 to 'docker-release-aao' from 'docker-local-aao', with status: 'Released', with comment: 'Promoted with Jenkins', failing on first error.\n07:45:08 Performing dry run promotion (no changes are made during dry run) ...\n07:45:08 Dry run finished successfully.\n07:45:08 Performing promotion ...\n07:45:07 Executing command: /bin/sh -c git log --pretty=format:%s -1\n07:45:11 Promotion completed successfully!\n07:45:11 [Pipeline] echo\n07:45:11 ================ END BUILD IMAGE ================\n07:45:11 [Pipeline] stage\n07:45:11 [Pipeline] { (Start deploy on perf)\n07:45:11 [Pipeline] echo\n07:45:11 ================ DEPLOY PARAMETERS ================\n07:45:11 [Pipeline] echo\n07:45:11 kuberentesNamespace = detailed-solution-perf\n07:45:11 [Pipeline] echo\n07:45:11 helmReleaseName = detailed-solution-perf-aggregator\n07:45:11 [Pipeline] echo\n07:45:11 env = perf\n07:45:11 [Pipeline] echo\n07:45:11 imageTag = 0.0.62\n07:45:11 [Pipeline] sh\n07:45:11 + git log -n 1 --pretty=format:%H\n07:45:11 [Pipeline] echo\n07:45:11 commitSha = 80ba9d66ebd498dde85711b150a4a93b9dd36dd6\n07:45:11 [Pipeline] echo\n07:45:11 ============== END DEPLOY PARAMETERS ==============\n07:45:11 [Pipeline] withCredentials\n07:45:11 Masking supported pattern matches of $SPRING_ROLE_ID or $SPRING_SECRET_ID\n07:45:11 [Pipeline] {\n07:45:11 [Pipeline] readFile\n07:45:11 [Pipeline] sh\n07:45:11 + envsubst\n07:45:11 [Pipeline] sh\n07:45:12 + mv -f values_full.yml values.yml\n07:45:12 [Pipeline] }\n07:45:12 [Pipeline] // withCredentials\n07:45:12 [Pipeline] echo\n07:45:12 ================ START DEPLOY ================\n07:45:12 [Pipeline] readYaml\n07:45:12 [Pipeline] sh\n07:45:12 + git log -n 1 --pretty=format:%H\n07:45:12 [Pipeline] stage\n07:45:12 [Pipeline] { (Deploy to lepus-a-stage)\n07:45:12 [Pipeline] withCredentials\n07:45:12 Masking supported pattern matches of $USERNAME or $PASSWORD\n07:45:12 [Pipeline] {\n07:45:12 [Pipeline] withEnv\n07:45:12 [Pipeline] {\n07:45:12 [Pipeline] isUnix\n07:45:12 [Pipeline] withEnv\n07:45:12 [Pipeline] {\n07:45:12 [Pipeline] sh\n07:45:13 + docker pull docker.art.lmru.tech/img-k8s-deployer:latest\n07:45:13 latest: Pulling from img-k8s-deployer\n07:45:13 Digest: sha256:3528ee39a8506c5b88c6a34d70b3bc9edd8fbd1360bfa88364a1a5bb340a5912\n07:45:13 Status: Image is up to date for docker.art.lmru.tech/img-k8s-deployer:latest\n07:45:13 docker.art.lmru.tech/img-k8s-deployer:latest\n07:45:13 [Pipeline] }\n07:45:13 [Pipeline] // withEnv\n07:45:13 [Pipeline] pwd\n07:45:13 [Pipeline] isUnix\n07:45:13 [Pipeline] withEnv\n07:45:13 [Pipeline] {\n07:45:13 [Pipeline] sh\n07:45:13 + docker inspect -f . docker.art.lmru.tech/img-k8s-deployer:latest\n07:45:13 .\n07:45:13 [Pipeline] }\n07:45:13 [Pipeline] // withEnv\n07:45:13 [Pipeline] withDockerContainer\n07:45:13 p-jenkins-node-m-11 does not seem to be running inside a container\n07:45:13 $ docker run -t -d -u 0:0 -u root -v /data/jenkins-root/workspace/d-solution--aggregator_develop_2:/pwd -w /data/jenkins-root/workspace/d-solution--aggregator_develop_2 -v /data/jenkins-root/workspace/d-solution--aggregator_develop_2:/data/jenkins-root/workspace/d-solution--aggregator_develop_2:rw,z -v /data/jenkins-root/workspace/d-solution--aggregator_develop_2@tmp:/data/jenkins-root/workspace/d-solution--aggregator_develop_2@tmp:rw,z -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** docker.art.lmru.tech/img-k8s-deployer:latest cat\n07:45:13 $ docker top c9948edabe8f8b4e56395b3256acaee2d87e8176650a80c09f8372cbef46ca53 -eo pid,comm\n07:45:13 [Pipeline] {\n07:45:13 [Pipeline] sh\n07:45:14 + get-kubeconfig-basic\n07:45:14 Using default value for CLUSTER_API_PREFIX = api-\n07:45:14 Using default value for CLUSTER_DOMAIN = apps.lmru.tech\n07:45:14 Kubeconfig file was created.\n07:45:14 [Pipeline] sh\n07:45:14 + helm3 repo update\n07:45:14 CLUSTER: lepus-a-stage\n07:45:17 Hang tight while we grab the latest from your chart repositories...\n07:45:17 ...Successfully got an update from the \"default\" chart repository\n07:45:17 ...Successfully got an update from the \"stable\" chart repository\n07:45:17 Update Complete. ⎈Happy Helming!⎈\n07:45:17 WARNING: Kubernetes configuration file is group-readable. This is insecure. Location: /root/.kube/config\n07:45:17 WARNING: Kubernetes configuration file is world-readable. This is insecure. Location: /root/.kube/config\n07:45:17 [Pipeline] sh\n07:45:17 + test -d solution\n07:45:18 [Pipeline] sh\n07:45:18 + helm3 fetch '--untar=true' --version 2.7.0 default/solution\n07:45:18 CLUSTER: lepus-a-stage\n07:45:18 WARNING: Kubernetes configuration file is group-readable. This is insecure. Location: /root/.kube/config\n07:45:18 WARNING: Kubernetes configuration file is world-readable. This is insecure. Location: /root/.kube/config\n07:45:18 [Pipeline] sh\n07:45:19 + helm3 dep up solution\n07:45:19 CLUSTER: lepus-a-stage\n07:45:19 WARNING: Kubernetes configuration file is group-readable. This is insecure. Location: /root/.kube/config\n07:45:19 WARNING: Kubernetes configuration file is world-readable. This is insecure. Location: /root/.kube/config\n07:45:19 [Pipeline] sh\n07:45:19 + helm3 upgrade --install --atomic --wait --create-namespace -f /pwd/values.yml --set 'tag=perf' --set 'sha=80ba9d66ebd498dde85711b150a4a93b9dd36dd6' --set 'deployOnProd=false' --set 'clusterName=lepus-a-stage' --timeout 3000s --set 'imageVersion=0.0.62' --set 'environment.springProfilesActive.default=perf' --namespace detailed-solution-perf detailed-solution-perf-aggregator solution\n07:45:19 CLUSTER: lepus-a-stage\n08:35:30 WARNING: Kubernetes configuration file is group-readable. This is insecure. Location: /root/.kube/config\n08:35:30 WARNING: Kubernetes configuration file is world-readable. This is insecure. Location: /root/.kube/config\n08:35:30 Error: UPGRADE FAILED: release detailed-solution-perf-aggregator failed, and has been rolled back due to atomic being set: client rate limiter Wait returned an error: context deadline exceeded\n08:35:30 Result of the deployment is saved to CMDB.\n08:35:31 [Pipeline] }\n08:35:31 $ docker stop --time=1 c9948edabe8f8b4e56395b3256acaee2d87e8176650a80c09f8372cbef46ca53\n08:35:32 $ docker rm -f --volumes c9948edabe8f8b4e56395b3256acaee2d87e8176650a80c09f8372cbef46ca53\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] // withDockerContainer\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] }\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] // withEnv\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] }\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] // withCredentials\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] }\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] // stage\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] error\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] }\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] // stage\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] echo\n08:35:32 java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Could not instantiate {message=hudson.AbortException: script returned exit code 1} for org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.steps.ErrorStep: java.lang.ClassCastException: org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.steps.ErrorStep.message expects class java.lang.String but received class hudson.AbortException\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] withCredentials\n08:35:32 Masking supported pattern matches of $STAGE_CHAT_ID\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] {\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] withCredentials\n08:35:32 Masking supported pattern matches of $TOKEN\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] {\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] catchError\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] {\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] retry\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] {\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] httpRequest\n08:35:32 Warning: A secret was passed to \"httpRequest\" using Groovy String interpolation, which is insecure.\n08:35:32 \t\t Affected argument(s) used the following variable(s): [TOKEN]\n08:35:32 \t\t See https://jenkins.io/redirect/groovy-string-interpolation for details.\n08:35:32 HttpMethod: POST\n08:35:32 URL: https://lemanapro.loop.ru/api/v4/posts\n08:35:32 Content-Type: application/json; charset=UTF-8\n08:35:32 Accept: application/json\n08:35:32 Authorization: *****\n08:35:32 Sending request to url: https://lemanapro.loop.ru/api/v4/posts\n08:35:32 Response Code: 201\n08:35:32 Success: Status code 201 is in the accepted range: 100:399\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] }\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] // retry\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] }\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] // catchError\n08:35:32 [Pipeline] }\n08:35:33 [Pipeline] // withCredentials\n08:35:33 [Pipeline] }\n08:35:33 [Pipeline] // withCredentials\n08:35:33 [Pipeline] }\n08:35:33 [Pipeline] // node\n08:35:33 [Pipeline] End of Pipeline\n08:35:33 java.lang.ClassCastException: org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.steps.ErrorStep.message expects class java.lang.String but received class hudson.AbortException\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for structs//org.jenkinsci.plugins.structs.describable.DescribableModel.coerce(DescribableModel.java:495)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for structs//org.jenkinsci.plugins.structs.describable.DescribableModel.buildArguments(DescribableModel.java:412)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for structs//org.jenkinsci.plugins.structs.describable.DescribableModel.instantiate(DescribableModel.java:328)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.DSL.invokeStep(DSL.java:312)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.DSL.invokeMethod(DSL.java:194)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsScript.invokeMethod(CpsScript.java:124)\n08:35:33 \tat java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(Unknown Source)\n08:35:33 \tat java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)\n08:35:33 \tat org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.CachedMethod.invoke(CachedMethod.java:98)\n08:35:33 \tat groovy.lang.MetaMethod.doMethodInvoke(MetaMethod.java:325)\n08:35:33 \tat groovy.lang.MetaClassImpl.invokeMethod(MetaClassImpl.java:1225)\n08:35:33 \tat groovy.lang.MetaClassImpl.invokeMethod(MetaClassImpl.java:1034)\n08:35:33 \tat org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.PogoMetaClassSite.call(PogoMetaClassSite.java:41)\n08:35:33 \tat org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.CallSiteArray.defaultCall(CallSiteArray.java:47)\n08:35:33 \tat org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.call(AbstractCallSite.java:116)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for script-security//org.kohsuke.groovy.sandbox.impl.Checker$1.call(Checker.java:180)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for script-security//org.kohsuke.groovy.sandbox.GroovyInterceptor.onMethodCall(GroovyInterceptor.java:23)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for script-security//org.jenkinsci.plugins.scriptsecurity.sandbox.groovy.SandboxInterceptor.onMethodCall(SandboxInterceptor.java:163)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for script-security//org.kohsuke.groovy.sandbox.impl.Checker$1.call(Checker.java:178)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for script-security//org.kohsuke.groovy.sandbox.impl.Checker.checkedCall(Checker.java:182)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for script-security//org.kohsuke.groovy.sandbox.impl.Checker.checkedCall(Checker.java:152)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.sandbox.SandboxInvoker.methodCall(SandboxInvoker.java:17)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.LoggingInvoker.methodCall(LoggingInvoker.java:120)\n08:35:33 Also: org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.actions.ErrorAction$ErrorId: 380555b5-f235-461f-9fc6-1bfd2d81f56c\n08:35:33 Caused: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Could not instantiate {message=hudson.AbortException: script returned exit code 1} for org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.steps.ErrorStep\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for structs//org.jenkinsci.plugins.structs.describable.DescribableModel.instantiate(DescribableModel.java:338)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.DSL.invokeStep(DSL.java:312)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.DSL.invokeMethod(DSL.java:194)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsScript.invokeMethod(CpsScript.java:124)\n08:35:33 \tat java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(Unknown Source)\n08:35:33 \tat java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)\n08:35:33 \tat org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.CachedMethod.invoke(CachedMethod.java:98)\n08:35:33 \tat groovy.lang.MetaMethod.doMethodInvoke(MetaMethod.java:325)\n08:35:33 \tat groovy.lang.MetaClassImpl.invokeMethod(MetaClassImpl.java:1225)\n08:35:33 \tat groovy.lang.MetaClassImpl.invokeMethod(MetaClassImpl.java:1034)\n08:35:33 \tat org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.PogoMetaClassSite.call(PogoMetaClassSite.java:41)\n08:35:33 \tat org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.CallSiteArray.defaultCall(CallSiteArray.java:47)\n08:35:33 \tat org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.call(AbstractCallSite.java:116)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for script-security//org.kohsuke.groovy.sandbox.impl.Checker$1.call(Checker.java:180)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for script-security//org.kohsuke.groovy.sandbox.GroovyInterceptor.onMethodCall(GroovyInterceptor.java:23)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for script-security//org.jenkinsci.plugins.scriptsecurity.sandbox.groovy.SandboxInterceptor.onMethodCall(SandboxInterceptor.java:163)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for script-security//org.kohsuke.groovy.sandbox.impl.Checker$1.call(Checker.java:178)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for script-security//org.kohsuke.groovy.sandbox.impl.Checker.checkedCall(Checker.java:182)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for script-security//org.kohsuke.groovy.sandbox.impl.Checker.checkedCall(Checker.java:152)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.sandbox.SandboxInvoker.methodCall(SandboxInvoker.java:17)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.LoggingInvoker.methodCall(LoggingInvoker.java:120)\n08:35:33 \tat solutionPipeline.deploy(solutionPipeline.groovy:450)\n08:35:33 \tat com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.CpsDefaultGroovyMethods.each(CpsDefaultGroovyMethods:2125)\n08:35:33 \tat com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.CpsDefaultGroovyMethods.each(CpsDefaultGroovyMethods:2110)\n08:35:33 \tat com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.CpsDefaultGroovyMethods.each(CpsDefaultGroovyMethods:2151)\n08:35:33 \tat solutionPipeline.deploy(solutionPipeline.groovy:423)\n08:35:33 \tat solutionPipeline.call(solutionPipeline.groovy:37)\n08:35:33 \tat ___cps.transform___(Native Method)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.impl.ContinuationGroup.methodCall(ContinuationGroup.java:107)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.impl.FunctionCallBlock$ContinuationImpl.dispatchOrArg(FunctionCallBlock.java:118)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.impl.FunctionCallBlock$ContinuationImpl.fixArg(FunctionCallBlock.java:87)\n08:35:33 \tat java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(Unknown Source)\n08:35:33 \tat java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.impl.ContinuationPtr$ContinuationImpl.receive(ContinuationPtr.java:71)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.impl.LocalVariableBlock$LocalVariable.get(LocalVariableBlock.java:39)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.LValueBlock$GetAdapter.receive(LValueBlock.java:30)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.impl.LocalVariableBlock.evalLValue(LocalVariableBlock.java:28)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.LValueBlock$BlockImpl.eval(LValueBlock.java:54)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.LValueBlock.eval(LValueBlock.java:16)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.Next.step(Next.java:84)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.Continuable.run0(Continuable.java:142)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.SandboxContinuable.access$001(SandboxContinuable.java:17)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.SandboxContinuable.run0(SandboxContinuable.java:48)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsThread.runNextChunk(CpsThread.java:188)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsThreadGroup.run(CpsThreadGroup.java:464)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsThreadGroup$2.call(CpsThreadGroup.java:372)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsThreadGroup$2.call(CpsThreadGroup.java:302)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsVmExecutorService.lambda$wrap$4(CpsVmExecutorService.java:143)\n08:35:33 \tat java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(Unknown Source)\n08:35:33 \tat hudson.remoting.SingleLaneExecutorService$1.run(SingleLaneExecutorService.java:139)\n08:35:33 \tat jenkins.util.ContextResettingExecutorService$1.run(ContextResettingExecutorService.java:28)\n08:35:33 \tat jenkins.security.ImpersonatingExecutorService$1.run(ImpersonatingExecutorService.java:68)\n08:35:33 \tat jenkins.util.ErrorLoggingExecutorService.lambda$wrap$0(ErrorLoggingExecutorService.java:51)\n08:35:33 \tat java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Unknown Source)\n08:35:33 \tat java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(Unknown Source)\n08:35:33 \tat java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(Unknown Source)\n08:35:33 \tat java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown Source)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsVmExecutorService$1.call(CpsVmExecutorService.java:53)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsVmExecutorService$1.call(CpsVmExecutorService.java:50)\n08:35:33 \tat org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.GroovyCategorySupport$ThreadCategoryInfo.use(GroovyCategorySupport.java:136)\n08:35:33 \tat org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.GroovyCategorySupport.use(GroovyCategorySupport.java:275)\n08:35:33 \tat PluginClassLoader for workflow-cps//org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.cps.CpsVmExecutorService.lambda$categoryThreadFactory$0(CpsVmExecutorService.java:50)\n08:35:33 \tat java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)\n08:35:33 \n08:35:33 GitHub has been notified of this commits build result\n08:35:33 \n08:35:33 Finished: FAILURE\n</user_query>"}]}}
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"По этому логу картина **другая**, чем «просто нет секретов в Vault» — хотя крашлуп из‑за Vault по‑прежнему может быть **причиной**, почему деплой не дождался готовности.\n\n## Что реально упало\n\n1. **Helm завершился с таймаутом ожидания**, не с явной ошибкой Vault:\n\n```text\nError: UPGRADE FAILED: release detailed-solution-perf-aggregator failed, and has been rolled back due to atomic being set: client rate limiter Wait returned an error: context deadline exceeded\n```\n\n2. **Время**: деплой стартовал около `07:45:19`, ошибка — `08:35:30`, то есть прошло **порядка 50 минут**. В команде указано `--timeout 3000s` (3000 секунд ≈ **50 минут**). То есть Helm **всё это время** ждал, пока релиз станет успешным по правилам `--wait`, и **исчерпал лимит**.\n\n3. С флагами **`--atomic` + `--wait`** при неуспехе Helm **откатывает** релиз. Сообщение про **client rate limiter** часто всплывает, когда клиент долго опрашивает API и упирается в **deadline** ожидания (не обязательно отдельная «проблема с rate limit кластера»).\n\nИтого: **прямая причина в логе — таймаут ожидания готовности релиза**, а не строка про Vault. Почему релиз не стал ready за 50 минут — в этом фрагменте **не видно** (нужны события/логи подов в `detailed-solution-perf` за это окно).\n\n## Параметры деплоя выглядят логично\n\nВ логе явно:\n\n- `env = perf`, `imageTag = 0.0.62`\n- `--set 'environment.springProfilesActive.default=perf'`\n- namespace `detailed-solution-perf`\n\nТо есть **профиль perf в Helm задан**, это не похоже на случайную подстановку `preprod` вместо `perf` **на уровне этой команды**.\n\n## Вторичная ошибка Jenkins (шум для разбора)\n\nВ конце:\n\n```text\nClassCastException: ErrorStep.message expects class java.lang.String but received class hudson.AbortException\nat solutionPipeline.deploy(solutionPipeline.groovy:450)\n```\n\nЭто **баг в shared library** `solutionPipeline`: в шаг `error` передают не строку, а `AbortException`. Он **маскирует** нормальное сообщение об ошибке деплоя; чинить нужно в `solution-utils`, не в репозитории сервиса.\n\n## Что проверить дальше (по факту, не по гипотезе)\n\nЧтобы связать с Vault или нет, в момент следующего падения нужно смотреть **в кластере** (за те же ~50 минут):\n\n- `kubectl describe pod` / `kubectl get events -n detailed-solution-perf` — **Back-off**, **CrashLoopBackOff**, **Readiness probe failed**, OOM.\n- Логи контейнера — есть ли **Spring Vault** / `403` / `404` / `Secret not found` при старте.\n\nЕсли поды **долго в CrashLoop** из‑за конфигурации/Vault, Helm как раз будет ждать до таймаута — тогда ваша изначальная гипотеза про секреты **согласуется** с этим логом, но **доказательство** — только из Kubernetes, не из Jenkins.\n\n**Кратко:** лог говорит «**деплой не стал ready за 50 минут, Helm откатился**»; отдельно в пайплайне есть **баг обработки ошибки** (`ClassCastException`). Чтобы подтвердить Vault, нужны **events/logs подов**, не только вывод `helm upgrade`.\n\n[REDACTED]"}]}}
{"role":"user","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"<user_query>\nпереключился в нужный контекст кубцтл, проверяй\n</user_query>"}]}}
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Проверяю состояние namespace `detailed-solution-perf` и связанных ресурсов.\n\n[REDACTED]"},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"kubectl config current-context && kubectl get ns detailed-solution-perf 2>&1; kubectl get pods,deploy,sts -n detailed-solution-perf -o wide 2>&1","description":"Verify context and list workloads in perf namespace"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"kubectl get events -n detailed-solution-perf --sort-by='.lastTimestamp' 2>&1 | tail -40","description":"Recent events in detailed-solution-perf namespace"}}]}}
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"[REDACTED]"},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"helm list -n detailed-solution-perf 2>&1; kubectl get hpa -n detailed-solution-perf 2>&1; kubectl get deploy aggregator -n detailed-solution-perf -o jsonpath='{.spec.template.spec.containers[0].image}{\"\\n\"}{.spec.replicas}{\"\\n\"}' 2>&1","description":"Helm releases, HPA, deployment image and replicas"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"kubectl describe deploy aggregator -n detailed-solution-perf 2>&1 | head -80","description":"Deployment details and conditions"}}]}}
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Кратко по тому, что видно в **текущем** контексте `lepus-a-stage`:\n\n## Состояние сейчас — нормальное\n\n| Проверка | Результат |\n|----------|-----------|\n| **Namespace** | `detailed-solution-perf` существует |\n| **Helm** | `detailed-solution-perf-aggregator`, chart `solution-2.7.0`, revision **9**, статус **deployed** (обновление **2026-04-08 11:47** МСК) |\n| **Deployment `aggregator`** | **9/9** Ready, Available |\n| **Образ** | `docker-aao.art.lmru.tech/aggregator:develop` (не `0.0.62` из упавшего job) |\n| **Профиль** | `SPRING_PROFILES_ACTIVE=perf` |\n| **Vault в поде** | `SPRING_ROLE_ID` и `SPRING_SECRET_ID` заданы в env (значения есть, дублировать их в чат не буду) |\n\n## HPA\n\n- `aggregator-hpa`: **9** реплик при max **10**, CPU по метрикам **высокий** (~119% к цели 80%) — нагрузка заметная, масштабирование в игре.\n\n## События\n\n- Недавний rolling update: новый ReplicaSet `aggregator-5df85ccc45`, старый `6b8c77d578` убран.\n- Короткие **Startup probe failed / connection refused** на старте — типично, пока JVM ещё не слушает порт; затем поды переходят в **Running 1/1**.\n\n## Связь с падением Jenkins\n\nВ логе падал деплой образа **`0.0.62`** с таймаутом Helm. Сейчас в кластере крутится **`develop`** — значит, после отката или отдельного деплоя среда пришла в рабочее состояние, но **релизный тег 0.0.62 здесь не зафиксирован**.\n\nЕсли нужно, могу отдельно подсказать команды для проверки истории ревизий Helm (`helm history`) или логов конкретного пода — напиши, что именно смотреть дальше.\n\n[REDACTED]"}]}}
{"role":"user","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"<user_query>\nзапутил билд 11:50:31 [Pipeline] echo\n11:50:31 Pipeline:\n11:50:31 {\n11:50:31 \"applicationConfig\": {\n11:50:31 \"functionalTests\": {\n11:50:31 \"branch\": \"master\",\n11:50:31 \"jobName\": \"aao/tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-functional-tests\"\n11:50:31 },\n11:50:31 \"vaultNamespace\": \"aao\",\n11:50:31 \"lmSaCredentialsId\": \"aao\",\n11:50:31 \"k8sNamespace\": \"detailed-solution\",\n11:50:31 \"loadTests\": {\n11:50:31 \"parameters\": {\n11:50:31 \"node\": \"lmru-dockerhost\",\n11:50:31 \"baseUrl\": \"https://detailed-solution-perf-lepus-a-stage.apps.lmru.tech/aggregator\",\n11:50:31 \"restRps\": \"400\",\n11:50:31 \"rabbitMps\": \"154\",\n11:50:31 \"rise\": \"5\",\n11:50:31 \"duration\": \"20\",\n11:50:31 \"class\": \"ru.leroymerlin.qa.test.CrawlerAndAggregatorSimulation\"\n11:50:31 },\n11:50:31 \"branch\": \"master\",\n11:50:31 \"jobName\": \"aao/tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-load-tests\"\n11:50:31 },\n11:50:31 \"javaVersion\": \"17\"\n11:50:31 },\n11:50:31 \"jobParams\": {\n11:50:31 \"runIacScan\": false,\n11:50:31 \"createSeparateEnvironment\": false,\n11:50:31 \"runScaScan\": false,\n11:50:31 \"deploy\": true,\n11:50:31 \"replicasCount\": \"\",\n11:50:31 \"profile\": \"preprod\",\n11:50:31 \"startHotfix\": false,\n11:50:31 \"build\": true,\n11:50:31 \"isDebug\": false,\n11:50:31 \"runCheckmarxScan\": false\n11:50:31 },\n11:50:31 \"buildInfo\": {\n11:50:31 \"microservice\": \"aggregator\",\n11:50:31 \"tasks\": [\n11:50:31 \n11:50:31 ],\n11:50:31 \"projectVersion\": \"0.0.63-SNAPSHOT\",\n11:50:31 \"imageTag\": \"0.0.63\",\n11:50:31 \"domainName\": \"aao\",\n11:50:31 \"targetVersion\": \"0.0.63\",\n11:50:31 \"brickName\": null\n11:50:31 },\n11:50:31 \"launchInfo\": {\n11:50:31 \"jobUrl\": \"https://jenkins.lmru.tech/job/aao/job/lmru-solution/job/lmru--detailed-solution/job/lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator/job/develop/7/\",\n11:50:31 \"branch\": \"develop\",\n11:50:31 \"tag\": null,\n11:50:31 \"changeId\": null,\n11:50:31 \"changeBranch\": null,\n11:50:31 \"author\": \"\\u0420\\u0443\\u0441\\u043b\\u0430\\u043d \\u041f\\u0435\\u0442\\u0440\\u043e\\u0432\\u0438\\u0447\"\n11:50:31 }\n</user_query>"}]}}
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Вот что видно из этого фрагмента пайплайна.\n\n## Главное: выбран профиль **preprod**\n\n```json\n\"profile\": \"preprod\"\n```\n\nПри `deploy: true` пайплайн будет ориентироваться на **preprod** (неймспейс/окружение из `solutionPipeline`, обычно что-то вроде `detailed-solution-preprod`, а не `detailed-solution-perf`).\n\nЭто **не** «чистый perf»-деплой. Perf в вашем сценарии часто идёт **отдельным шагом** (например, после релизной сборки образа) или другим параметром job — смотрите дальше по логу стадии **Deploy** / **DEPLOY PARAMETERS** (`env`, `helmReleaseName`, `kuberentesNamespace`).\n\n## Остальное по конфигу\n\n| Поле | Значение |\n|------|----------|\n| Ветка | `develop` |\n| Версия / тег образа | `0.0.63` (`0.0.63-SNAPSHOT` в Maven) |\n| Сборка и деплой | `build: true`, `deploy: true` |\n| Функциональные / нагрузочные тесты | в конфиге указаны job’ы и `baseUrl` для **perf** — это просто **настройки тестов** (куда бить нагрузкой), они **не** переключают профиль деплоя на perf |\n\n## Практический вывод\n\nЕсли цель была **обновить только perf**, а в параметрах job стоит **`profile: preprod`**, то сначала уедет **preprod**. Чтобы деплоить именно perf, в Jenkins нужно выставить профиль **`perf`** (или как у вас в UI называется этот параметр), если пайплайн это поддерживает одной сборкой.\n\nЕсли пришлёте следующий кусок лога — блок **`DEPLOY PARAMETERS`** и строку **`helm3 upgrade`** — можно точно сказать, в какой namespace и с каким `springProfilesActive` ушла эта сборка **#7**.\n\n[REDACTED]"}]}}
{"role":"user","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"<user_query>\n\t\nРуслан Исанбаев\n3 часа назад\nПри сборке релиза в препрод, есть шаг сдеелать деплой в perf среду, на этом этапе в кубе под уходит рестарт так как не видит секреты в волте, к самому волту подключается при этом. Если запустить сборку не релизную, а чисто на perf или другие среды, проблем нет и всё собирается.\nсейчас как раз завис деплой\n11:58:05 ================ END BUILD IMAGE ================\n11:58:05 [Pipeline] stage\n11:58:05 [Pipeline] { (Start deploy on perf)\n11:58:05 [Pipeline] echo\n11:58:05 ================ DEPLOY PARAMETERS ================\n11:58:05 [Pipeline] echo\n11:58:05 kuberentesNamespace = detailed-solution-perf\n11:58:05 [Pipeline] echo\n11:58:05 helmReleaseName = detailed-solution-perf-aggregator\n11:58:05 [Pipeline] echo\n11:58:05 env = perf\n11:58:05 [Pipeline] echo\n11:58:05 imageTag = 0.0.63\n11:58:05 [Pipeline] sh\n11:58:06 + git log -n 1 --pretty=format:%H\n11:58:06 [Pipeline] echo\n11:58:06 commitSha = 6e72af3aa837ba9d3a49bd9be9131da355dec3f5\n11:58:06 [Pipeline] echo\n11:58:06 ============== END DEPLOY PARAMETERS ==============\n11:58:06 [Pipeline] withCredentials\n11:58:06 Masking supported pattern matches of $SPRING_ROLE_ID or $SPRING_SECRET_ID\n11:58:06 [Pipeline] {\n11:58:06 [Pipeline] readFile\n11:58:06 [Pipeline] sh\n11:58:06 + envsubst\n11:58:06 [Pipeline] sh\n11:58:06 + mv -f values_full.yml values.yml\n11:58:06 [Pipeline] }\n11:58:06 [Pipeline] // withCredentials\n11:58:06 [Pipeline] echo\n11:58:06 ================ START DEPLOY ================\n11:58:06 [Pipeline] readYaml\n11:58:06 [Pipeline] sh\n11:58:07 + git log -n 1 --pretty=format:%H\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] stage\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] { (Deploy to lepus-a-stage)\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] withCredentials\n11:58:07 Masking supported pattern matches of $USERNAME or $PASSWORD\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] {\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] withEnv\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] {\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] isUnix\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] withEnv\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] {\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] sh\n11:58:07 + docker pull docker.art.lmru.tech/img-k8s-deployer:latest\n11:58:07 latest: Pulling from img-k8s-deployer\n11:58:07 Digest: sha256:3528ee39a8506c5b88c6a34d70b3bc9edd8fbd1360bfa88364a1a5bb340a5912\n11:58:07 Status: Image is up to date for docker.art.lmru.tech/img-k8s-deployer:latest\n11:58:07 docker.art.lmru.tech/img-k8s-deployer:latest\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] }\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] // withEnv\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] pwd\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] isUnix\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] withEnv\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] {\n11:58:07 [Pipeline] sh\n11:58:08 + docker inspect -f . docker.art.lmru.tech/img-k8s-deployer:latest\n11:58:08 .\n11:58:08 [Pipeline] }\n11:58:08 [Pipeline] // withEnv\n11:58:08 [Pipeline] withDockerContainer\n11:58:08 p-jenkins-node-m-17 does not seem to be running inside a container\n11:58:08 $ docker run -t -d -u 0:0 -u root -v /data/jenkins-root/workspace/led-solution--aggregator_develop:/pwd -w /data/jenkins-root/workspace/led-solution--aggregator_develop -v /data/jenkins-root/workspace/led-solution--aggregator_develop:/data/jenkins-root/workspace/led-solution--aggregator_develop:rw,z -v /data/jenkins-root/workspace/led-solution--aggregator_develop@tmp:/data/jenkins-root/workspace/led-solution--aggregator_develop@tmp:rw,z -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** docker.art.lmru.tech/img-k8s-deployer:latest cat\n11:58:08 $ docker top 39933416a265286e2853a5281ac686a22c1dcaf2e3d202faa6f2db62522fb1bb -eo pid,comm\n11:58:08 [Pipeline] {\n11:58:08 [Pipeline] sh\n11:58:08 + get-kubeconfig-basic\n11:58:08 Using default value for CLUSTER_API_PREFIX = api-\n11:58:08 Using default value for CLUSTER_DOMAIN = apps.lmru.tech\n11:58:08 Kubeconfig file was created.\n11:58:08 [Pipeline] sh\n11:58:09 + helm3 repo update\n11:58:09 CLUSTER: lepus-a-stage\n11:58:11 Hang tight while we grab the latest from your chart repositories...\n11:58:11 ...Successfully got an update from the \"default\" chart repository\n11:58:11 ...Successfully got an update from the \"stable\" chart repository\n11:58:11 Update Complete. ⎈Happy Helming!⎈\n11:58:11 WARNING: Kubernetes configuration file is group-readable. This is insecure. Location: /root/.kube/config\n11:58:11 WARNING: Kubernetes configuration file is world-readable. This is insecure. Location: /root/.kube/config\n11:58:11 [Pipeline] sh\n11:58:12 + test -d solution\n11:58:12 [Pipeline] sh\n11:58:12 + helm3 fetch '--untar=true' --version 2.7.0 default/solution\n11:58:12 CLUSTER: lepus-a-stage\n11:58:13 WARNING: Kubernetes configuration file is group-readable. This is insecure. Location: /root/.kube/config\n11:58:13 WARNING: Kubernetes configuration file is world-readable. This is insecure. Location: /root/.kube/config\n11:58:13 [Pipeline] sh\n11:58:13 + helm3 dep up solution\n11:58:13 CLUSTER: lepus-a-stage\n11:58:13 WARNING: Kubernetes configuration file is group-readable. This is insecure. Location: /root/.kube/config\n11:58:13 WARNING: Kubernetes configuration file is world-readable. This is insecure. Location: /root/.kube/config\n11:58:13 [Pipeline] sh\n11:58:13 + helm3 upgrade --install --atomic --wait --create-namespace -f /pwd/values.yml --set 'tag=perf' --set 'sha=6e72af3aa837ba9d3a49bd9be9131da355dec3f5' --set 'deployOnProd=false' --set 'clusterName=lepus-a-stage' --timeout 3000s --set 'imageVersion=0.0.63' --set 'environment.springProfilesActive.default=perf' --namespace detailed-solution-perf detailed-solution-perf-aggregator solution\n11:58:13 CLUSTER: lepus-a-stage\n</user_query>"}]}}
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Проверяю кластер: смотрим, на чём зависает `helm upgrade --wait` (обычно ожидание готовности подов).\n\n[REDACTED]"},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"kubectl config current-context 2>/dev/null; kubectl get pods -n detailed-solution-perf -l app=aggregator -o wide 2>&1; echo \"---\"; kubectl rollout status deploy/aggregator -n detailed-solution-perf --timeout=15s 2>&1; echo \"---\"; kubectl get rs -n detailed-solution-perf -l app=aggregator 2>&1","description":"Check aggregator pods and rollout status in perf"}},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"helm status detailed-solution-perf-aggregator -n detailed-solution-perf 2>&1; echo \"---\"; kubectl get events -n detailed-solution-perf --field-selector involvedObject.kind=Pod --sort-by='.lastTimestamp' 2>&1 | tail -25","description":"Helm release status and recent pod events"}}]}}
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"[REDACTED]"},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Shell","input":{"command":"kubectl logs -n detailed-solution-perf aggregator-dbfbffb75-dd64c --tail=80 2>&1; echo \"=== describe ===\"; kubectl describe pod -n detailed-solution-perf aggregator-dbfbffb75-dd64c 2>&1 | tail -35","description":"Logs and describe for Error pod new RS"}}]}}
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"В логах пода причина уже **явная**, это не «абстрактный Vault», а **отсутствие подставленных свойств из KV**.\n\n## Что пишет приложение\n\n```text\nCould not resolve placeholder 'vault.elastic.username' in value \"${vault.elastic.username}\"\n```\n\nПрофиль задан верно: **`perf`**. Tomcat уже поднимается, падает на создании бина `elasticsearchConfig`, потому что **`vault.elastic.*` так и не попали в Environment** — Spring не находит ни `vault.elastic.username`, ни связанных ключей.\n\nТо есть коллега формулировал верно: **к Vault (AppRole) вы, скорее всего, ходите, а нужных секретов в контексте приложения нет** — либо **политика AppRole не отдаёт чтение** `perf/detailed-solution/aggregator`, либо **в секрете нет полей** под `elastic` (имена/структура не совпадают с тем, что ждёт Spring Cloud Vault).\n\n## Важная деталь: другие учётные данные\n\nВ **новом** поде с образом `0.0.63` в `describe` видны **другие** `SPRING_ROLE_ID` / `SPRING_SECRET_ID`, чем у рабочего деплоя с `aggregator:develop` (мы раньше видели другие UUID). Значит релизный шаг **`withCredentials` + `envsubst`** подставляет **не те же** креды, что у «обычного» деплоя на perf. Если у этой пары **нет read на perf KV** или секрет другой — получите ровно такую ошибку.\n\n## Почему «зависает» Helm\n\n`helm upgrade --wait` ждёт, пока новые поды станут Ready. Они **в CrashLoopBackOff** из‑за падения JVM → таймаут до **3000s**, как в прошлый раз.\n\n## Что делать (по смыслу, без правок кода в репо)\n\n1. **Vault (namespace `aao`)** \n - Проверить, что по пути **`perf/detailed-solution/aggregator`** есть данные для `elastic` (username/password), в том формате, который ожидает Spring Vault для вашего KV. \n - Проверить **политику AppRole**, которую подставляет **именно релизный** Jenkins credential для шага «deploy on perf» — **read** на этот путь.\n\n2. **Jenkins** \n - Сравнить **credential id** для `SPRING_ROLE_ID` / `SPRING_SECRET_ID` в релизном perf-деплое и в успешном «только perf» job — они должны быть эквивалентны по доступу к **perf**.\n\n3. **Быстрая проверка** \n - С теми же Role/Secret ID, что в упавшем поде, локально или через Vault CLI: **прочитать** `perf/detailed-solution/aggregator` и убедиться, что там есть ключи под elastic.\n\nИтог: это **согласование доступа AppRole к perf KV и содержимого секрета**, плюс **выравнивание кредов** между релизным и обычным perf-деплоем; падение в коде/образе здесь вторично — падает из‑за неразрешённых `${vault.elastic.username}`.\n\n[REDACTED]"}]}}
{"role":"user","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"<user_query>\nperf/detailed-solution/aggregator\n{\n \"app-users-password\": {\n \"admin\": \"todo\",\n \"note\": \"It's stored only in db, the app doesn't read it from here\",\n \"state-manager\": \"todo\"\n },\n \"basic.user\": {\n \"password\": \"123\",\n \"username\": \"est\"\n },\n \"vault\": {\n \"elastic\": {\n \"password\": \"123\",\n \"username\": \"stic\"\n },\n \"kafka\": {\n \"password\": \"123\",\n \"username\": \"olution-all\"\n },\n \"kafka-ha\": {\n \"password\": \"132\",\n \"username\": \"detailed\"\n }\n }\n}\n</user_query>"}]}}
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Структура секрета, которую вы показали, **как раз подходит** под то, что ждёт приложение: вложенный объект `vault.elastic.username` / `password` в Spring обычно превращается в свойства `vault.elastic.username` и `vault.elastic.password`. С точки зрения **формата данных** тут всё согласовано с `application.yml` (`${vault.elastic.username}` и т.д.).\n\nЗначит вывод из логов нужно уточнить так:\n\n## 1. Данные в Vault есть — но **под с тем токеном, с которым вы смотрите UI**\n\nВ UI вы видите содержимое **под своей учёткой** или под политикой админа. В поде же используются **другие** `SPRING_ROLE_ID` / `SPRING_SECRET_ID` из Jenkins (`withCredentials` + `envsubst`). Если у **этого** AppRole нет `read` на `perf/.../detailed-solution/aggregator` (или только на `preprod`, а не на `perf`), ответ Vault для приложения будет **пустой** — и Spring честно пишет: placeholder `vault.elastic.username` не разрешён.\n\nТо есть противоречия нет: **секрет в Vault заполнен**, но **релизный пайплайн подставляет креды, которые этот секрет не читают**.\n\n## 2. Проверка «на земле»\n\nИмеет смысл одним из способов **с теми же Role ID / Secret ID**, что попали в упавший под (или из того же Jenkins credential), выполнить чтение пути и посмотреть **сырое тело** ответа (например `vault kv get -mount=perf detailed-solution/aggregator` в нужном namespace). Если там пусто или 403 — проблема в **политике AppRole**, не в JSON.\n\n## 3. Мелочь по содержимому\n\nУ вас в примере пароли выглядят как заглушки (`todo`, `123`) — для **реального** perf это может быть отдельная тема (доступ к Elastic/Kafka), но **ошибка `Could not resolve placeholder`** возникает раньше: свойства вообще не подставляются, то есть дело именно в **доставке секрета в приложение**, а не в том, что `stic`/`123` неверны для Elasticsearch.\n\n**Итог:** показанный JSON не опровергает диагноз — он подтверждает, что **путь и структура в принципе верные**. Нужно выровнять **доступ AppRole из релизного шага** с тем, что используется при успешном «чистом» perf-деплое, либо расширить политику для релизных кредов на `perf/detailed-solution/aggregator`.\n\n[REDACTED]"}]}}
{"role":"user","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"<user_query>\nдобавили прав апроли, прошло\nтеперь новая ошибка\n+ helm3 upgrade --install --atomic --wait --create-namespace -f /pwd/values.yml --set 'tag=perf' --set 'sha=6e72af3aa837ba9d3a49bd9be9131da355dec3f5' --set 'deployOnProd=false' --set 'clusterName=lepus-a-stage' --timeout 3000s --set 'imageVersion=0.0.63' --set 'environment.springProfilesActive.default=perf' --namespace detailed-solution-perf detailed-solution-perf-aggregator solution\n11:58:13 CLUSTER: lepus-a-stage\n12:16:09 Release \"detailed-solution-perf-aggregator\" has been upgraded. Happy Helming!\n12:16:09 NAME: detailed-solution-perf-aggregator\n12:16:09 LAST DEPLOYED: Wed Apr 8 11:58:13 2026\n12:16:09 NAMESPACE: detailed-solution-perf\n12:16:09 STATUS: deployed\n12:16:09 REVISION: 10\n12:16:09 TEST SUITE: None\n12:16:09 NOTES:\n12:16:09 Kotanam Slava!\n12:16:09 WARNING: Kubernetes configuration file is group-readable. This is insecure. Location: /root/.kube/config\n12:16:09 WARNING: Kubernetes configuration file is world-readable. This is insecure. Location: /root/.kube/config\n12:16:09 Result of the deployment is saved to CMDB.\n12:16:09 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:09 $ docker stop --time=1 39933416a265286e2853a5281ac686a22c1dcaf2e3d202faa6f2db62522fb1bb\n12:16:13 $ docker rm -f --volumes 39933416a265286e2853a5281ac686a22c1dcaf2e3d202faa6f2db62522fb1bb\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] // withDockerContainer\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] // withEnv\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] // withCredentials\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] // stage\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] parallel\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] { (Branch: Kubedog lepus-a-stage)\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] withCredentials\n12:16:13 Masking supported pattern matches of $USERNAME or $PASSWORD\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] {\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] withEnv\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] {\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] isUnix\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] withEnv\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] {\n12:16:13 [Pipeline] sh\n12:16:14 + docker pull docker.art.lmru.tech/img-k8s-deployer:latest\n12:16:14 latest: Pulling from img-k8s-deployer\n12:16:14 Digest: sha256:3528ee39a8506c5b88c6a34d70b3bc9edd8fbd1360bfa88364a1a5bb340a5912\n12:16:14 Status: Image is up to date for docker.art.lmru.tech/img-k8s-deployer:latest\n12:16:14 docker.art.lmru.tech/img-k8s-deployer:latest\n12:16:14 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:14 [Pipeline] // withEnv\n12:16:14 [Pipeline] pwd\n12:16:14 [Pipeline] isUnix\n12:16:14 [Pipeline] withEnv\n12:16:14 [Pipeline] {\n12:16:14 [Pipeline] sh\n12:16:14 + docker inspect -f . docker.art.lmru.tech/img-k8s-deployer:latest\n12:16:14 .\n12:16:14 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:14 [Pipeline] // withEnv\n12:16:14 [Pipeline] withDockerContainer\n12:16:14 p-jenkins-node-m-17 does not seem to be running inside a container\n12:16:14 $ docker run -t -d -u 0:0 -u root -v /data/jenkins-root/workspace/led-solution--aggregator_develop:/pwd -w /data/jenkins-root/workspace/led-solution--aggregator_develop -v /data/jenkins-root/workspace/led-solution--aggregator_develop:/data/jenkins-root/workspace/led-solution--aggregator_develop:rw,z -v /data/jenkins-root/workspace/led-solution--aggregator_develop@tmp:/data/jenkins-root/workspace/led-solution--aggregator_develop@tmp:rw,z -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** -e ******** docker.art.lmru.tech/img-k8s-deployer:latest cat\n12:16:15 $ docker top 78b2caa904b14763cadfa681fbecbfc958b90c4a6c6a1823223ae768a5a296a9 -eo pid,comm\n12:16:15 [Pipeline] {\n12:16:15 [Pipeline] sh\n12:16:15 + get-kubeconfig-basic\n12:16:15 Using default value for CLUSTER_API_PREFIX = api-\n12:16:15 Using default value for CLUSTER_DOMAIN = apps.lmru.tech\n12:16:15 Kubeconfig file was created.\n12:16:15 [Pipeline] sh\n12:16:15 + echo '{\"Deployments\": [{\"ResourceName\": \"aggregator\", \"Namespace\": \"detailed-solution-perf\"}]}'\n12:16:15 + kubedog multitrack --timeout 300\n12:16:17 ┌ Status progress\n12:16:17 │ DEPLOYMENT REPLICAS AVAILABLE UP-TO-DATE \n12:16:17 │ aggregator 9/9 9 9 \n12:16:17 │ │ POD READY RESTARTS STATUS \n12:16:17 │ └── dbfbffb75-fmsk6 1/1 8 Running \n12:16:17 └ Status progress\n12:16:17 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:17 $ docker stop --time=1 78b2caa904b14763cadfa681fbecbfc958b90c4a6c6a1823223ae768a5a296a9\n12:16:19 $ docker rm -f --volumes 78b2caa904b14763cadfa681fbecbfc958b90c4a6c6a1823223ae768a5a296a9\n12:16:19 [Pipeline] // withDockerContainer\n12:16:19 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:19 [Pipeline] // withEnv\n12:16:19 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:19 [Pipeline] // withCredentials\n12:16:19 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:19 [Pipeline] // parallel\n12:16:19 [Pipeline] sh\n12:16:19 + git describe --abbrev=0 --tags 0.0.63^ --always\n12:16:19 [Pipeline] sh\n12:16:20 + git log --oneline 0.0.62...0.0.63\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] echo\n12:16:20 JIRA tasks were found between tags 0.0.62 - 0.0.63 : []\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] echo\n12:16:20 ================ END DEPLOY ================\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] // stage\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] stage\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] { (Call load tests)\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] echo\n12:16:20 ================ START RUN LOAD TESTS ================\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] echo\n12:16:20 Run gatling load tests: name aao/tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-load-tests, branch: master, params: [[node:lmru-dockerhost, baseUrl:https://detailed-solution-perf-lepus-a-stage.apps.lmru.tech/aggregator, restRps:400, rabbitMps:154, rise:5, duration:20, class:ru.leroymerlin.qa.test.CrawlerAndAggregatorSimulation]]\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] build\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] echo\n12:16:20 Load tests failed\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] echo\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] stage\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] { (Copy Gatling report)\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] copyArtifacts\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] // stage\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] // stage\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] echo\n12:16:20 hudson.AbortException: Unable to find project for artifact copy: aao/tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-load-tests\n12:16:20 This may be due to incorrect project name or permission settings; see help for project name in job configuration.\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] withCredentials\n12:16:20 Masking supported pattern matches of $STAGE_CHAT_ID\n12:16:20 [Pipeline] {\n12:16:21 [Pipeline] withCredentials\n12:16:21 Masking supported pattern matches of $TOKEN\n12:16:21 [Pipeline] {\n12:16:21 [Pipeline] catchError\n12:16:21 [Pipeline] {\n12:16:21 [Pipeline] retry\n12:16:22 [Pipeline] {\n12:16:22 [Pipeline] httpRequest\n12:16:22 Warning: A secret was passed to \"httpRequest\" using Groovy String interpolation, which is insecure.\n12:16:22 \t\t Affected argument(s) used the following variable(s): [TOKEN]\n12:16:22 \t\t See https://jenkins.io/redirect/groovy-string-interpolation for details.\n12:16:22 HttpMethod: POST\n12:16:22 URL: https://lemanapro.loop.ru/api/v4/posts\n12:16:22 Content-Type: application/json; charset=UTF-8\n12:16:22 Accept: application/json\n12:16:22 Authorization: *****\n12:16:22 Sending request to url: https://lemanapro.loop.ru/api/v4/posts\n12:16:22 Response Code: 201\n12:16:22 Success: Status code 201 is in the accepted range: 100:399\n12:16:22 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:22 [Pipeline] // retry\n12:16:22 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:22 [Pipeline] // catchError\n12:16:22 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:22 [Pipeline] // withCredentials\n12:16:22 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:22 [Pipeline] // withCredentials\n12:16:22 [Pipeline] }\n12:16:22 [Pipeline] // node\n12:16:22 [Pipeline] End of Pipeline\n12:16:22 ERROR: Unable to find project for artifact copy: aao/tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-load-tests\n12:16:22 This may be due to incorrect project name or permission settings; see help for project name in job configuration.\n12:16:23 \n12:16:23 GitHub has been notified of this commits build result\n12:16:23 \n12:16:23 Finished: FAILURE\n</user_query>"}]}}
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Деплой **уже прошёл успешно** — это видно по строкам:\n\n```text\nRelease \"detailed-solution-perf-aggregator\" has been upgraded. Happy Helming!\nSTATUS: deployed\n```\n\nKubedog тоже отработал: `aggregator 9/9`, `9 AVAILABLE`.\n\n## В чём новая ошибка\n\nПайплайн падает **после** деплоя, на шаге **нагрузочных тестов и копирования отчёта**:\n\n1. `Load tests failed` — downstream job нагрузочных тестов не дал успешного результата (или не отработал как ожидается).\n2. Затем шаг **`copyArtifacts`** ищет job по пути \n **`aao/tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-load-tests`** \n и не находит его:\n\n```text\nUnable to find project for artifact copy: aao/tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-load-tests\nThis may be due to incorrect project name or permission settings\n```\n\nТо есть это **не Kubernetes и не приложение**, а **Jenkins**: либо job с таким полным именем не существует / переименован / в другом folder, либо у job’а, который крутит пайплайн, **нет прав** видеть/копировать артефакты из этого проекта.\n\n## Что сделать\n\n1. В Jenkins открыть **точный URL** job’а нагрузочных тестов и сравнить путь с тем, что в `Jenkinsfile` (`loadTests.testJobName`: `aao/tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-load-tests`). Если путь другой — поправить имя в конфиге пайплайна (или переименовать job в Jenkins).\n2. Проверить **права** (Matrix/Role strategy): у сервисной учётки / пользователя, под которым идёт сборка, должен быть доступ к этому job’у и к артефактам.\n3. Открыть **сам build** `aao/tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-load-tests` за это время — понять, почему он «failed» (тесты упали, job disabled, параметры и т.д.).\n\nИтог: **релизный деплой в perf вы исправили**; текущий `FAILURE` — из‑за **конфигурации/доступа к Jenkins job нагрузочных тестов** (и, возможно, из‑за падения самого прогона Gatling), а не из‑за Helm или Vault.\n\n[REDACTED]"}]}}
{"role":"user","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"<user_query>\nточный урл https://jenkins.lmru.tech/job/aao/job/Tests/job/detailed-solution-aggregator-load-tests/ \n</user_query>"}]}}
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Путь в конфиге указан как `aao/tests/...` (нижний регистр), а реальная папка — `Tests`. Обновляю `testJobName` в `Jenkinsfile`.\n\n[REDACTED]"},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Read","input":{"path":"/home/ruslanpi/Documents/repos/lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator/Jenkinsfile"}}]}}
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"[REDACTED]"},{"type":"tool_use","name":"StrReplace","input":{"path":"/home/ruslanpi/Documents/repos/lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator/Jenkinsfile","old_string":" \"testJobName\": \"aao/tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-load-tests\",","new_string":" \"testJobName\": \"aao/Tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-load-tests\","}}]}}
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"[REDACTED]"},{"type":"tool_use","name":"Grep","input":{"path":"/home/ruslanpi/Documents/repos/lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator","pattern":"detailed-solution-aggregator-functional"}}]}}
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Обновляю путь к functional-tests: он в той же папке `Tests`.\n\n[REDACTED]"},{"type":"tool_use","name":"StrReplace","input":{"path":"/home/ruslanpi/Documents/repos/lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator/Jenkinsfile","old_string":" \"testJobName\": \"aao/tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-functional-tests\"","new_string":" \"testJobName\": \"aao/Tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-functional-tests\""}}]}}
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Откатываю изменение functional-tests — подтверждён только URL нагрузочных тестов.\n\n[REDACTED]"},{"type":"tool_use","name":"StrReplace","input":{"path":"/home/ruslanpi/Documents/repos/lmru--detailed-solution--aggregator/Jenkinsfile","old_string":" \"testJobName\": \"aao/Tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-functional-tests\"","new_string":" \"testJobName\": \"aao/tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-functional-tests\""}}]}}
{"role":"assistant","message":{"content":[{"type":"text","text":"Готово.\n\n**Что было не так:** в `Jenkinsfile` был путь `aao/tests/...` (нижний регистр), а в Jenkins папка называется **`Tests`**, как в URL \n`.../job/aao/job/Tests/job/detailed-solution-aggregator-load-tests/`.\n\n**Что сделано:** для `loadTests` указано:\n\n`aao/Tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-load-tests`\n\nФункциональные тесты оставлены как `aao/tests/...` — вы дали точный URL только для load tests. Если при прогоне функциональных тестов снова будет «Unable to find project», проверьте их job в Jenkins и при необходимости замените на `aao/Tests/detailed-solution-aggregator-functional-tests` по тому же принципу.\n\n[REDACTED]"}]}}